Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 3 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 7 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 11 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 16 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 26 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 27 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 56 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 72 days
All due dates
Legal Live

Schedule to the Commercial Courts Act, 2015: Order XVIII - Written Arguments and Affidavits of Evidence

A party shall submit concise written arguments under distinct headings within four weeks prior to commencing oral arguments; they form part of the record and must be furnished to...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
1
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Legal
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Two paragraphs of the Schedule amend Order XVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for commercial suits. Paragraph 8 substitutes sub-rules (3A) to (3F) of Rule 2, which make written arguments mandatory, due within four weeks before oral arguments begin. Paragraph 9 inserts sub-rules (1A) to (1C) in Rule 4, which require every witness's affidavit of evidence to be filed together at the time fixed at the first Case Management Hearing. This article reads both as amended up to 3 May 2018, as per the text consulted, for parties planning a commercial suit filing. Both paragraphs are headed "Amendment of Order XVIII". The Schedule prints "judgements"; this series writes "judgments".

Paragraph 8: Order XVIII Rule 2, sub-rules (3A) to (3F)

The paragraph says that in Rule 2 of Order XVIII, "for sub-rules (3A), (3B), (3C), (3D), (3E) and (3F), the following shall be substituted".

Sub-ruleWhat it says
(3A)A party shall, within four weeks prior to commencing the oral arguments, submit concisely and under distinct headings written arguments in support of his case to the Court, and the written arguments shall form part of the record
(3B)The written arguments shall clearly indicate the provisions of the laws being cited and the citations of judgments relied upon, and include copies of those judgments
(3C)A copy of the written arguments shall be furnished simultaneously to the opposite party
(3D)The Court may, if it deems fit, after the conclusion of arguments, permit the parties to file revised written arguments within not more than one week after the date of conclusion of arguments
(3E)No adjournment shall be granted for the purpose of filing written arguments unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, considers it necessary
(3F)The Court may limit the time for oral submissions having regard to the nature and complexity of the matter

How the sub-rules work together

  • Timing (3A). The four weeks are counted back from the start of oral arguments. If oral arguments start on a fixed date, the written arguments are due four weeks before it.
  • Content (3B). The argument must name the statutory provisions and the judgments relied upon and attach copies. A party cannot cite a decision without supplying it. The text asks for citations but this article gives none.
  • Exchange (3C). The opposite party gets a copy at the same time as the Court.
  • Revision (3D). After arguments end, the Court may allow revised written arguments within one week at most. The permission is at the Court's discretion ("if it deems fit").
  • No easy adjournments (3E). An adjournment for filing written arguments needs written reasons.
  • Time limits (3F). The Court can limit oral submissions by the nature and complexity of the matter. This ties in with Order XV-A Rule 2(g), which lets the court set time limits for advocates at a case management hearing; see our article on case management hearings.

Paragraph 9: Order XVIII Rule 4, sub-rules (1A) to (1C)

The paragraph inserts three sub-rules after sub-rule (1) of Rule 4.

Sub-ruleWhat it says
(1A)The affidavits of evidence of all witnesses whose evidence is proposed to be led by a party shall be filed simultaneously by that party at the time directed in the first Case Management Hearing
(1B)A party shall not lead additional evidence by the affidavit of any witness (including a witness who has already filed an affidavit) unless sufficient cause is made out in an application and an order, giving reasons, permitting the additional affidavit is passed by the Court
(1C)A party has the right to withdraw any affidavit filed at any time prior to commencement of cross-examination of that witness, without any adverse inference being drawn based on the withdrawal

Proviso to (1C). "Provided that any other party shall be entitled to tender as evidence and rely upon any admission made in such withdrawn affidavit."

What this means in practice

  • One filing day. Under (1A), all of a party's witnesses file affidavits together at the time set at the first Case Management Hearing, as fixed under Order XV-A Rule 2(c); see our article on Order XV-A Rules 1 to 5.
  • No second bite without cause. Additional affidavits need an application showing sufficient cause and a reasoned order (1B). This applies even to a witness who has already filed.
  • Withdrawal is allowed, but it does not erase the affidavit. A party may withdraw an affidavit before cross-examination begins, and no adverse inference is drawn from the withdrawal (1C). But under the proviso, any other party may still rely on an admission made in the withdrawn affidavit. A careless affidavit therefore stays dangerous even if withdrawn.

The format of affidavits

What an affidavit of evidence must look like is dealt with by the Schedule's Order XIX Rule 6, covered in our article on Order XIX and Order XX. Under Order XV-A Rule 6(1)(m) and (n), the court can reject or strike off parts of an affidavit of evidence with irrelevant, inadmissible or argumentative material. For the general idea of an affidavit, see our guide to affidavits, which describes the general rule, not the commercial-suit version.

The timeline from filing to judgment

StageSourceMarker
First Case Management Hearing fixes the date for affidavits of evidenceOrder XV-A Rule 2(c)At the hearing
All affidavits of evidence filed togetherOrder XVIII Rule 4(1A)At the time directed
Written arguments filedOrder XVIII Rule 2(3A)Within four weeks prior to commencing oral arguments
Revised written argumentsRule 2(3D)Not more than one week after conclusion of arguments, if permitted
JudgmentOrder XX Rule 1Within ninety days of the conclusion of arguments

Practical tips

  • Draft the written argument early, since four weeks before oral arguments can arrive soon after evidence closes.
  • Build a short table of provisions and judgments, and attach copies of every judgment cited.
  • Serve the opposite party on the same day.
  • Decide the list of witnesses before the first Case Management Hearing, so that all affidavits can be filed together.
  • Think before withdrawing an affidavit: the other side may use an admission in it.

Example. Sahyadri Chemicals Ltd and its customer are told at the first Case Management Hearing that affidavits of evidence are due on a fixed date. Sahyadri files affidavits for all four witnesses on that date. Later it finds it omitted a technical point and applies to file an additional affidavit, showing sufficient cause. The court allows it by a reasoned order. Four weeks before oral arguments, both sides file written arguments under distinct headings with copies of the judgments cited and exchange them the same day.

Points to check in the text

  • Paragraphs 8 and 9 are both headed "Amendment of Order XVIII".
  • The Schedule prints "judgements"; this series writes "judgments".
  • The text does not say what happens if written arguments are not filed within the four weeks, apart from the powers in Order XV-A Rule 8.

Need help with written arguments and affidavits of evidence?

Both documents have fixed timing and content rules. If you want your evidence and arguments prepared to the timetable of a commercial suit, see our commercial suit filing page.

Key takeaways

  • Written arguments are due within four weeks prior to commencing oral arguments, concise and under distinct headings, and form part of the record.
  • Arguments must cite the provisions and judgments relied on and attach copies, and be furnished to the other side simultaneously.
  • Revised written arguments are allowed for not more than one week after conclusion of arguments, at the Court's discretion.
  • All affidavits of evidence are filed together at the time fixed at the first Case Management Hearing.
  • Additional affidavits need sufficient cause and a reasoned order; withdrawal is allowed before cross-examination, but admissions can still be used.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a text of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as amended up to 3 May 2018 and on the Ninth Schedule to the Mediation Act, 2023 as enacted, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Later amendments, the current Specified Value, the pre-institution mediation rules and High Court rules should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Schedule

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

When must written arguments be filed?

Within four weeks prior to commencing the oral arguments (Rule 2(3A)).

What must they contain?

They must be concise, under distinct headings, indicate the provisions of law cited and the judgments relied on, and include copies of those judgments (3A and 3B).

Stamp and register what the law requires; an unstamped document is a weak witness.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Schedule: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
12,982 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Within four weeks prior to commencing the oral arguments (Rule 2(3A)).

They must be concise, under distinct headings, indicate the provisions of law cited and the judgments relied on, and include copies of those judgments (3A and 3B).

Yes, if the Court permits, within not more than one week after the date of conclusion of arguments (3D).

Simultaneously for all witnesses, at the time directed in the first Case Management Hearing (Rule 4(1A)).

Only if sufficient cause is made out in an application and the Court passes a reasoned order permitting it (1B).

Yes, at any time before cross-examination of that witness begins, without adverse inference, but any other party may rely on an admission in the withdrawn affidavit (1C and its proviso).