Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 6 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 22 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 44 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 52 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 265 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 3 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 7 days
All due dates

Rules 1–8 of the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016: cases moved from High Courts to the Tribunal, pending winding-up petitions, records and fees

The rules came into force on 15 December 2016, except rule 4, from 1 April 2017. Pending proceedings other than winding up stood transferred to the Tribunal's Benches with...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
6
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
MCA Compliance
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 7, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

The Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016 were a transitional set. They moved proceedings under the earlier Companies Act, 1956 that were pending before High Courts to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), divided winding-up matters into those that would move and those that would stay, and ordered the records to follow the cases. They are stated as amended up to the 2017 amendments shown in the notes of the MCA e-book; later amendments should be checked.

What kind of rules these are

These are transition rules made under section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with section 239(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. They matter today mainly for lawyers, students and company records departments who meet old files, orders or references to the "Companies (Court) Rules, 1959". The Act's own provision is in Sections 407–434 of the Companies Act, 2013: NCLT, NCLAT and Special Courts.

For the winding-up procedure the Tribunal follows today under the Companies Act, 2013, see the Winding Up Rules articles beginning with Rules 1–4: application, definitions, petition and statement of affairs and Rules 14–17: provisional liquidator and Company Liquidator. For insolvency, see our overview of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

If you are dealing with an old file or an old reference, our team can help you trace what the rules provided. Start with legal dispute resolution.

Rule 1: title and commencement

The rules may be called the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016 (notification of 7 December 2016). They came into force from 15 December 2016, except rule 4, from 1 April 2017.

Rule 2: definitions

"Code" means the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. "Tribunal" means the National Company Law Tribunal constituted under section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013. Words not defined here but defined in the Companies Act, 1956 (called "the Act" in these rules), the Companies Act, 2013, the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 or the Code have the meanings given in them.

Rule 3: cases other than winding up

All proceedings under the Act (the 1956 Act), including proceedings relating to arbitration, compromise, arrangements and reconstruction, other than proceedings relating to winding up, pending on the date these rules came into force, stood transferred to the Benches of the Tribunal exercising respective territorial jurisdiction. A proviso says that proceedings reserved for orders for allowing or otherwise were not transferred.

Rule 4: voluntary winding up

All proceedings relating to voluntary winding up of a company, where notice of the resolution by advertisement had been given under section 485(1) of the 1956 Act but the company had not been dissolved before 1 April 2017, continue to be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of that Act. This rule was substituted by the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Second Amendment Rules, 2017, dated 29 June 2017.

Rule 5: winding-up petitions on the ground of inability to pay debts

5(1). Petitions under clause (e) of section 433 of the 1956 Act, on the ground of inability to pay debts, pending before a High Court, where the petition had not been served on the respondent under rule 26 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, were transferred to the NCLT Bench exercising territorial jurisdiction, to be dealt with in accordance with Part II of the Code. Three provisos follow:

  • the petitioner had to submit all information required for admission of the petition under sections 7, 8 or 9 of the Code, other than information forming part of the transferred records, including details of the proposed insolvency professional, up to 15 July 2017, failing which the petition stood abated;
  • after 15 July 2017, any party could file fresh applications under sections 7, 8 or 9 of the Code; and
  • where a petition was not transferred and stayed in the High Court, and another petition under clause (e) of section 433 against the same company was pending as on 15 December 2016, that other petition was not transferred, even if not served on the respondent.

Rule 5 was substituted by the Second Amendment Rules, 2017 (30 June 2017, effective 16 June 2017 as the e-book notes). An earlier amendment dated 28 February 2017 had changed a period in the first proviso. Both are earlier history; the text above is the current one.

Rule 6: other winding-up grounds

Petitions under clauses (a) and (f) of section 433 of the 1956 Act pending before a High Court, where the petition had not been served on the respondent under rule 26 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, were transferred to the Tribunal Bench exercising territorial jurisdiction and are treated as petitions under the Companies Act, 2013.

Rule 7: transfer of records

Pursuant to the transfer, the relevant records were also to be transferred by the High Courts to the NCLT Benches having jurisdiction forthwith.

Rule 8: no fee

Notwithstanding anything in the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016, no fee is payable in respect of any proceeding transferred to the Tribunal under these rules.

Reading these rules today

The dates in rules 1 and 5 have passed. A reader meeting an old matter should look at what the rule provided for that kind of proceeding, check the dates and the amendments, and take legal advice on the position of the particular case. This article draws no conclusion about any case. The rules refer to older statutes (the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959) as printed; they are quoted only to explain the transfer.

Example. A winding-up petition on the ground of inability to pay debts had been filed in a High Court against Ashoka Bearings Ltd under clause (e) of section 433 of the 1956 Act but had not been served on the company. Rule 5 provided that it would be transferred to the NCLT Bench with territorial jurisdiction to be dealt with under Part II of the Code, and the petitioner had to supply the information needed for admission, including the proposed insolvency professional's details, up to 15 July 2017, or the petition abated. A suit for arbitration or reconstruction that was merely pending would have fallen under rule 3 and moved, unless reserved for orders.

Which rule covered what

RuleSubjectWhat it providedDate or period as printed
1CommencementIn force from 15 December 2016 (rule 4 from 1 April 2017)15 December 2016; 1 April 2017
3Cases other than winding upTransferred to Tribunal Benches; reserved matters not transferredOn commencement
4Voluntary winding upContinues under the 1956 Act if notice given but not dissolved before the date1 April 2017
5Winding up, inability to pay debtsUnserved petitions transferred; dealt with under Part II of the CodeInformation by 15 July 2017 or abatement
6Winding up, clauses (a) and (f)Unserved petitions transferred; treated as petitions under 2013 ActOn commencement
7RecordsTransferred forthwithNone
8FeesNo fee on transferred proceedingsNone

Need help tracing an old proceeding?

Old petitions and orders can carry references that no longer match today's procedure. We can help you read the history of a file and see what the transition rules provided. A good first step is legal dispute resolution.

Key takeaways

  • The rules were transitional; their dates have passed.
  • Non-winding-up proceedings under the 1956 Act moved to the NCLT, except matters reserved for orders.
  • Unserved winding-up petitions on inability to pay debts moved to be dealt with under Part II of the Code, subject to an information deadline.
  • Unserved petitions on other listed grounds moved and are treated as petitions under the 2013 Act.
  • Records follow the cases, and no fee is payable on transferred proceedings.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Companies Act, 2013 rules named above as consolidated in the MCA e-book (consulted on 3 October 2026), with the later notifications the article names. Later amendments, fees, forms and the Companies Act, 2013 provisions referred to should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Rules

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What did rule 3 transfer?

All pending proceedings under the 1956 Act other than winding up, including arbitration, compromise, arrangements and reconstruction, except those reserved for orders.

What happened to voluntary winding up?

Under rule 4, proceedings where notice of the resolution had been advertised under section 485(1) but the company had not been dissolved before 1 April 2017 continue under the 1956 Act's provisions.

The portal accepting a form does not mean the form was correct — check before you submit.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Rules: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

All pending proceedings under the 1956 Act other than winding up, including arbitration, compromise, arrangements and reconstruction, except those reserved for orders.

Under rule 4, proceedings where notice of the resolution had been advertised under section 485(1) but the company had not been dissolved before 1 April 2017 continue under the 1956 Act's provisions.

Information for admission under sections 7, 8 or 9 of the Code had to be submitted up to 15 July 2017, failing which the petition stood abated.

No. Rule 8 says no fee is payable for proceedings transferred under these rules.

The dates have passed and this article draws no conclusion on any case; take advice on the specific file.