Next dueImport-Export
30 JUNIEC update · Annual confirmation on DGFT (Apr–Jun)in 271 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 13 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 18 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 58 days
All due dates
FEMA Live

DA vs DP vs LC — Choosing Export Payment Terms

Advance payment, letter of credit, documents against payment, documents against acceptance and open account compared on risk, cost, financing and buyer appeal — and how to pick...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
51
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
FEMA
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

The Risk Ladder

TermExporter riskBuyer appealFinancing quality
Advance paymentLowestLowestNo financing needed
Confirmed irrevocable LCVery lowLow — ties up the buyer's credit line and costs them feesBest — finest negotiation rates
Unconfirmed irrevocable LCLow, but carries issuing bank and country riskModerateGood
Documents against payment (D/P)Moderate — goods stranded if the buyer refusesModerateFair — bills purchased at wider spreads
Documents against acceptance (D/A)High — goods released before paymentGoodWeaker
Open accountHighestHighestPoorest — no document control

Advance Payment

Full or partial payment before shipment. Full advance is rare outside first orders, small values and scarce products. A partial advance — commonly 30% with the balance against documents — is a practical middle ground that covers your material cost and demonstrates the buyer's commitment.

Letter of Credit

The issuing bank undertakes to pay against a complying presentation of documents. The critical points an exporter must internalise:

  • The undertaking is documentary. Banks pay against documents, not goods. Perfect goods with discrepant documents do not get paid on the bank's obligation.
  • Confirmation is what removes country risk. An unconfirmed LC from a bank in a country with exchange restrictions is only as reliable as that country's ability to remit. Confirmation by a bank in India, or another acceptable jurisdiction, converts it into a domestic-quality obligation.
  • Read the credit on arrival. Unworkable conditions must be amended before goods move, not discovered at presentation.
  • Beware buyer-controlled conditions. A required inspection certificate signed by the applicant hands the buyer a switch over your payment.

Cost sits with the buyer for issuance and usually with the exporter for confirmation and negotiation, though this is negotiable and should be stated in the contract.

Documents against Payment (D/P)

Your bank sends documents to the buyer's bank with instructions to release only against payment. No bank promises to pay — the banks act as agents handling documents under the collections rules.

What protects you: the buyer cannot get the goods without paying, provided the transport document is one that requires surrender of an original.

What exposes you: if the buyer simply refuses, your goods are at a foreign port accruing demurrage, and your realistic options are to find another buyer locally at a discount or ship them back at cost. That is why D/P suits readily resaleable goods and not custom-made ones.

Documents against Acceptance (D/A)

Documents are released against the buyer's acceptance of a bill of exchange payable at a future date. The moment the documents go, the buyer has the goods and you have a piece of paper.

Treat D/A as a credit decision, not a payment term. Apply the same discipline you would to lending:

  • Credit report and trading history on the buyer
  • ECGC country category checked and buyer limit approved
  • Exposure capped per buyer
  • Tenor kept as short as the market allows
  • Interest on the usance period built into the price

Open Account

Goods and documents are sent directly to the buyer, who pays on the agreed date. It is the norm in several sectors and in intra-group trade, and refusing it outright can cost you the business.

Make it survivable rather than refusing it: hold an ECGC policy with an approved limit for that buyer, cap the exposure, invoice promptly and chase early, and revisit the limit whenever payment behaviour changes.

Matching the Term to the Situation

SituationSensible term
First order, unknown buyer, weaker marketAdvance payment, or confirmed irrevocable LC
Known buyer, weaker marketConfirmed LC, or D/P with ECGC cover
Known buyer, strong marketUnconfirmed LC or D/P
Long-standing buyer, strong marketD/A or open account with ECGC cover
Custom-made or unsaleable-elsewhere goodsSubstantial advance plus LC; never D/A
Commodity, readily resaleableD/P is workable
Buyer with an established group parentConsider a parent guarantee alongside open account

Pricing the Term

Payment terms are a cost, and they belong in the price. A 90-day D/A sale ties up working capital for 90 days, carries a financing cost at your export credit rate, carries an ECGC premium, and carries residual default risk. Quote a discount for advance payment and a premium for extended credit, explicitly. Buyers respond to a stated differential far better than to a refusal.

Practical Tips

  • Set an internal policy — maximum exposure per buyer, per country, and per payment term — and apply it consistently instead of deciding order by order.
  • Check the ECGC country classification before agreeing terms, not before shipping.
  • Under a collection, nominate a case-of-need in the buyer's country and define their authority precisely.
  • Never send documents directly to a buyer under a collection; that defeats the entire mechanism.
  • Under an LC, present early enough to correct and re-present within the 21-day and expiry limits.
  • Review terms annually per buyer. Relationships improve and deteriorate, and terms should follow.

Related Services & Guides

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About DA vs DP vs

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the safest export payment term?

Advance payment, because the money is received before the goods leave. It is also the hardest to negotiate. The safest term a buyer will usually accept is a confirmed irrevocable letter of credit.

What is the difference between DP and DA?

Under documents against payment the buyer's bank releases the shipping documents only when the buyer pays. Under documents against acceptance the documents are released against the buyer's acceptance of a bill of exchange, so the buyer gets the goods before paying.

A correct code on the shipping bill is worth more than a correction request afterwards.

— TaxClue Trade & FEMA Desk

DA vs DP vs: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
10,823 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Advance payment, because the money is received before the goods leave. It is also the hardest to negotiate. The safest term a buyer will usually accept is a confirmed irrevocable letter of credit.

Under documents against payment the buyer's bank releases the shipping documents only when the buyer pays. Under documents against acceptance the documents are released against the buyer's acceptance of a bill of exchange, so the buyer gets the goods before paying.

It gives a bank's undertaking to pay against a complying presentation. Payment depends on your documents complying exactly, not on the goods. A discrepant presentation converts the bank obligation into the buyer's discretion, so document discipline is what makes the LC worth having.

A second bank, usually in the exporter's own country, adds its independent undertaking. That removes the risk of the issuing bank failing and the risk of the issuing country restricting remittance — which is exactly the risk that matters in weaker markets.

Yes, for long-standing buyers in low-risk markets where the commercial relationship justifies it, ideally backed by an ECGC policy with an approved buyer limit. It is the norm in some sectors, and refusing it can cost the business.

Substantially. LC-backed bills can be negotiated at the finest rates. Collection bills are purchased or discounted at wider spreads. Open account receivables are the hardest and costliest to finance, since the bank has no document control.