GST LIVE

Blocked, Reversed, Ineligible: Three Words, Three Meanings

They appear interchangeably in practice and mean different things in the return, the annual return and a notice. Getting the label right changes the reconciliation.

Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert
5 min read 6 views Updated Sep 6, 2026 Expert Reviewed Medium Complexity
Blocked, Reversed, Ineligible: Three Words, Three Meanings
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27Verified against: Government sources
Quick Answer

They appear interchangeably in practice and mean different things in the return, the annual return and a notice. Getting the label right changes the reconciliation.

In conversation these are used interchangeably. In GSTR-3B Table 4, GSTR-9 Table 7 and a show cause notice, they are not — and mixing them up produces a reconciliation that will not tie and a reply that does not answer the allegation.

The four categories

1. Ineligible under s.17(5). Motor vehicles, food and beverages, membership of a club, construction of immovable property, goods lost or given away, and the rest of the list. Never availed. Reported in GSTR-3B Table 4(D)(1) as ineligible credit under s.17(5).

2. Ineligible for another reason. Credit that fails a s.16(2) condition — no invoice, goods not received, supplier did not report — or is time-barred under s.16(4). Also never availed. Reported in Table 4(D)(2) as "others".

3. Reversed, permanently. Availed correctly, then given back and not recoverable — Rule 42 D1 and D2, Rule 43 Te, s.18(4) on entering composition, s.29(5) on cancellation. Reported in GSTR-3B Table 4(B)(1).

4. Reversed, reclaimable. Availed correctly, given back temporarily, recoverable later — Rule 37 (non-payment within 180 days), Rule 37A (supplier's non-filing), and reversals on account of IMS action. Reported in GSTR-3B Table 4(B)(2), and tracked in the portal's Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement.

Why Table 4(B)(1) versus 4(B)(2) matters

The split was introduced precisely because the two behave differently.

4(B)(1) — permanent. The credit is gone. It does not come back and should not be tracked for reclaim.

4(B)(2) — reclaimable. The portal maintains a running Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement from the opening balance reported by taxpayers, and any reclaim in Table 4(A)(5) with the corresponding disclosure in Table 4(D)(1) is validated against it.

Reporting a permanent reversal in 4(B)(2) inflates the reclaimable balance and generates a system warning when it is never reclaimed. Reporting a temporary reversal in 4(B)(1) forfeits the tracked balance and makes a later reclaim look unsupported.

Rule 86A blocking is none of these

A Rule 86A block is an enforcement measure on the ledger, not a determination about credit.

  • The credit remains availed and remains in the ledger.
  • It is not reported as reversed in Table 4(B).
  • It cannot be utilised while the block subsists.
  • It lapses after one year.
  • It creates no liability — a demand requires a s.73, s.74 or s.74A notice.

So a business under a Rule 86A block has not reversed anything and should not be filing as if it had. Rule 86A: blocking the credit ledger →

Where each appears in GSTR-9

TableWhat it captures
6B to 6HITC availed, by category
7A to 7HITC reversed — Rule 37, Rule 39, Rule 42, Rule 43, s.17(5), reversal of TRAN credit, and others
8CITC on inward supplies of the year availed in the next year up to the specified period
8EITC available but not availed
8FITC available but ineligible

Note that Table 7E is specifically s.17(5) reversal — which is conceptually odd, since s.17(5) credit should never have been availed. In practice, businesses that availed and then reversed report it here; those that never availed it report it in Table 8F or leave it out of the availment figures altogether. Both approaches are seen; consistency across years matters more than the choice.

Getting the reply right

When a notice alleges "wrongly availed credit", identify which category it actually concerns:

  • s.17(5) blocked — the defence is that the item falls within an exception or outside the clause.
  • s.16(2) condition failure — the defence is documentary.
  • s.16(4) time bar — check s.16(5) and s.16(6). Sections 16(5) and 16(6) →
  • Rule 42/43 short reversal — the defence is the computation.
  • Rule 37/37A — the defence is that payment was made, or the supplier filed.
  • Interest — check whether the credit was utilised at all under Rule 88B(3). Interest on wrongly availed ITC →

A reply that addresses the wrong category concedes the right one.

Key takeaways

  • Ineligible — never availed. Reversed — availed then given back. Blocked — either s.17(5) ineligibility or a Rule 86A ledger action.
  • Table 4(B)(1) is permanent reversal; Table 4(B)(2) is reclaimable.
  • The portal tracks reclaimable reversals in the Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement.
  • A Rule 86A block is not a reversal and is not reported as one.
  • GSTR-9 Table 7 captures reversals; Table 8E and 8F capture credit not availed.
  • Identify the category before replying to a notice.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on ICAI Background Material on GST, Volume I (2026 edition) and the ICAI Technical Guide on GST Annual Return (Form GSTR-9).

Key Facts About Blocked

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the difference between ineligible and reversed ITC?

Ineligible credit is never availed because the law does not allow it. Reversed credit was validly availed and then given back.

What is the difference between Table 4(B)(1) and 4(B)(2) in GSTR-3B?

4(B)(1) is permanent reversal; 4(B)(2) is reversal that can be reclaimed later, such as under Rule 37 or Rule 37A.

Over 90% of compliance penalties in India arise from missed due dates — timely handling can save businesses thousands of rupees each year.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Blocked: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ineligible and reversed ITC?
Ineligible credit is never availed because the law does not allow it. Reversed credit was validly availed and then given back.
What is the difference between Table 4(B)(1) and 4(B)(2) in GSTR-3B?
4(B)(1) is permanent reversal; 4(B)(2) is reversal that can be reclaimed later, such as under Rule 37 or Rule 37A.
Is a Rule 86A block a reversal?
No. It stops utilisation of credit that remains availed and in the ledger. It is not reported as a reversal.
Where is section 17(5) credit reported?
As ineligible credit in GSTR-3B Table 4(D)(1), and in GSTR-9 either as a reversal in Table 7E or as ineligible in Table 8F, depending on whether it was availed first.
How does the portal track reclaimable reversals?
Through the Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement, which validates reclaims in Table 4(A)(5) against reversals reported in Table 4(B)(2).
Does a Rule 86A block create a tax liability?
No. A liability requires a notice and order under section 73, 74 or 74A.

Was this article helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!
VS
Vikas Sharma VERIFIED EXPERT
7431 articles
Tax & Compliance Expert
Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

Related Guides

All guides →