Next due
20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 4 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 5 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 14 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 22 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 26 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 36 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 44 days
All due dates

Sections 63–64 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Vacancy in the Office of President and Validity of Proceedings

When the office of President of the National Commission is vacant, or the President is unable to perform the duties by reason of absence or otherwise, the duties are performed by...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
12
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Consumer Protection
Published
October 3, 2026
Last updated
Oct 3, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 63 says who performs the duties of the President of the National Commission when the office is vacant or the President cannot act. Section 64 protects the work of the District, State and National Commissions from being struck down only because a member's seat is vacant or the Commission was not properly constituted. For a consumer or business with a pending order, section 64 is the more practical of the two, and our legal consultation team can help you read what it does and does not protect.

The two sections at a glance

SectionApplies toRule
63National Commission onlySenior-most member performs the President's duties during a vacancy or inability; a retired High Court Judge or Judicial Member presides if one is a member
64District, State and National CommissionsNo invalidity by reason only of a vacancy among members or a defect in constitution

Section 63: when the President's office is vacant

The main rule: "When the office of President of the National Commission is vacant or a person occupying such office is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, these shall be performed by the senior-most member of the National Commission."

There are two triggers:

  • The office is vacant. There is no President in position.
  • The President is unable to perform the duties. The words "by reason of absence or otherwise" cover illness, leave or any other reason; "or otherwise" is not limited to absence.

In either case "the duties of his office" pass to the senior-most member. The duties are all the duties of the President under the Act, so they include the ones the Act names elsewhere, such as constituting Benches under section 58(2) and the administrative role under section 70. See section 58 on jurisdiction and Benches.

The proviso: a retired High Court Judge or a Judicial Member

"Provided that where a retired Judge of a High Court or a person who has been a Judicial Member is a member of the National Commission, such member or where the number of such members is more than one, the senior-most person amongst such members, shall preside over the National Commission in the absence of President of that Commission."

Read this carefully:

SituationWho presides
No retired High Court Judge or Judicial Member among the membersSenior-most member of the Commission
One such memberThat member
More than one such memberThe senior-most among them
  • The proviso overrides the general rule when it applies, because it names a particular class of members who "shall preside".
  • The proviso uses the words "in the absence of President", whereas the main rule also covers a vacancy. The text does not say whether the proviso applies in a vacancy too. It is a drafting gap that this article flags without correcting.
  • "Senior-most" is not defined. The text does not say whether seniority is by age, by date of appointment or by something else.
  • Neither the rule nor the proviso says how long such a person may carry on, who appoints a new President, or whether the person gets the President's casting vote or other powers beyond "the duties of his office".

Example. The President of the National Commission retires on 30 June and the post is not filled for some months. The senior-most member, Ms Rao, performs the President's duties. If the Commission also had a retired High Court Judge as a member, the proviso would put that member in the chair instead.

Section 64: vacancies and defects do not invalidate orders

"No act or proceeding of the District Commission, the State Commission or the National Commission shall be invalid by reason only of the existence of any vacancy amongst its members or any defect in the constitution thereof."

This one sentence does a lot of work. Take its words in turn:

  • "Act or proceeding". The protection covers what the Commission does, such as hearing a case, and the proceedings as a whole, which include orders made.
  • All three Commissions. Unlike section 63, section 64 names the District, State and National Commissions.
  • "By reason only of". The word "only" matters. If an order is open to challenge on another ground, such as no hearing being given to a party, section 64 does not cure that. It shuts off one argument only: that the Commission was short of members, or was defectively constituted.
  • "Any vacancy amongst its members". The text speaks of members. Whether a vacant office of President counts as "a vacancy amongst its members" is not spelled out; section 63 separately covers the President's office.
  • "Any defect in the constitution". The Act does not say what counts, for example a defect in a member's appointment or in the number of members who sit. The section's printed heading refers to "defects in appointment not to invalidate orders", but the operative words talk of "defect in the constitution".

Example. A State Commission has one member's post vacant for a year. A seller who lost a complaint argues that the order is invalid because the full strength of members was not in place. Section 64 answers that argument: a vacancy alone does not invalidate the Commission's proceedings. If the seller was never served with notice, though, that is a separate point; see section 65 on service of notice.

What the text leaves out

  • Quorum or minimum strength. Sections 63 and 64 give no minimum number of members needed to hear a case. Look at the sections on Benches and on each Commission's constitution for that.
  • Filling the vacancy. Appointment of a President is dealt with elsewhere in the Act. These two sections only keep the work going.
  • State and District Commissions' President. Section 63 speaks only of the National Commission. It says nothing about who acts when the President of a State or District Commission is absent.

Need help with a challenge based on the Commission's constitution?

If an order against you was passed while members were absent or seats were vacant, or you want to know how far section 64 protects it, read the order and the Commission's composition on the date of the hearing. Our team can look at the facts and the order with you. Reach out through our legal consultation page and bring the order and cause list.

Key takeaways

  • Section 63: the senior-most member performs the President's duties in a vacancy or inability.
  • A retired High Court Judge or Judicial Member presides in the President's absence under the proviso.
  • Section 64 covers all three levels of Commission.
  • A vacancy or defect in constitution alone does not make an act or proceeding invalid.
  • Other grounds for challenging an order stay open.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 as enacted, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Monetary limits, fees and procedure are set or revised by rules and regulations made under the Act and should be checked in their current form. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 63

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who runs the National Commission when the President's post is vacant?

The senior-most member (s.63), unless a retired High Court Judge or Judicial Member is a member, in which case that member presides.

Does section 63 apply to a State or District Commission?

No. It is written for the National Commission only.

Settlement terms are safest when they are recorded the same day they are agreed.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Sections 63: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The senior-most member (s.63), unless a retired High Court Judge or Judicial Member is a member, in which case that member presides.

No. It is written for the National Commission only.

Not on that ground alone. Section 64 says no act or proceeding is invalid by reason only of a vacancy amongst the members.

No. It speaks of a vacancy or a defect in constitution, and uses the words "by reason only of".

The Act does not say.

Yes. It names the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission.