Next dueIncome Tax
21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 6 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 37 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 61 days 31 DECBelated / revised ITR · AY 2026-27in 77 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026due today 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 5 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 15 days
All due dates
Income Tax Live

Section 469 of the Income-tax Act, 2025: Power to Reduce or Waive Penalty in Certain Cases

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, at his discretion, reduce or waive the section 439 penalty if the person voluntarily and in good faith made a full and true...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
12
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Income Tax
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 13, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Section 469 gives the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner two separate powers over penalties. Sub-sections (1) to (4) let them reduce or waive a penalty under section 439 for a person who disclosed voluntarily and co-operated. Sub-sections (5) to (9) let them, on application, reduce, waive, stay or compound penalties, or recovery proceedings for them, on grounds of genuine hardship. This article follows the text as per the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026. For help preparing an application, see our legal dispute resolution service.

First power: section 469(1) to (4)

Sub-section (1): who and when

Irrespective of anything in the Act, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, whether on his own motion or otherwise, at his discretion reduce or waive the penalty imposed or imposable under section 439 if he is satisfied that the person:

ClauseCondition
(a)Before the Assessing Officer detected any concealment of particulars of income or the inaccuracy of particulars furnished in respect of such income, made a full and true disclosure of such particulars voluntarily and in good faith
(b)Has cooperated in any enquiry relating to the assessment of his income and has paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay any tax or interest payable in consequence of an order passed under the Act in respect of the relevant tax year

Both clauses are joined by "and". The power is for penalties under section 439 only; the penalty itself is explained in our post on section 439.

Sub-section (2): deemed full and true disclosure

For sub-section (1), a person is deemed to have made full and true disclosure of his income or the particulars relating to it if the difference between the assessed and returned income does not attract penalties under section 439.

Sub-section (3): approval above Rs. 5,00,000

Irrespective of sub-sections (1) and (2), if in a case under section 439 the amount of income in respect of which the penalty is imposed or imposable for the relevant tax year, or, where the disclosure relates to more than one tax year, the aggregate amount of such income or disclosure for those years, exceeds Rs. 5,00,000, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall obtain prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Director General or Director General, as the case may be, before waiving or reducing the penalty.

Sub-section (4): once only

Where an order has been made under sub-section (1) in favour of any person, whether it relates to one or more tax years, he shall not be entitled to any relief under this section in relation to any other tax year at any time after the order. The relief is therefore a single-use relief.

Example (amounts assumed). Anita Mehra, an individual, finds before any query from the department that she omitted Rs. 3,00,000 of income in her return. She discloses fully and in good faith, co-operates and pays the tax and interest. The Principal Commissioner may reduce or waive the penalty. Because Rs. 3,00,000 is below Rs. 5,00,000, no prior approval from a higher authority is needed. If the income involved had been Rs. 7,50,000, sub-section (3) would require prior approval first. Having received relief for one year, she cannot claim relief under sub-section (4) for another tax year later.

Second power: section 469(5) to (9)

Sub-section (5): genuine hardship

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, upon an application from the assessee, and after recording his reasons, reduce or waive the amount of penalty or penalties (whether they relate to one or more tax years) payable by the assessee, or stay or compound any proceeding for the recovery of any such amount, if:

  • (a) doing otherwise would cause genuine hardship to the assessee, having regard to the circumstances of the case; and
  • (b) the assessee has cooperated in any inquiry relating to the assessment or any proceeding for the recovery of any amount due from him.

Unlike sub-section (1), this power is not confined to section 439; it speaks of "penalty or penalties payable by the assessee". Also unlike sub-section (1), it needs an application and recorded reasons.

Sub-sections (6) to (9)

Sub-sectionRule
(6)The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall take prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Director General or Director General, as the case may be, if the aggregate amount of penalties reduced, waived or compounded under sub-section (5) exceeds Rs. 1,00,000
(7)The order under sub-section (5), accepting or rejecting the application, shall be passed within twelve months from the end of the month in which the application was received
(8)No rejection of the application shall be made without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard
(9)Every order made under this section shall be final and shall not be called into question by any court or any other authority

Example (amounts and dates assumed). Prakash Sound Systems has penalties of Rs. 2,50,000 payable. The partners show that payment would cause genuine hardship and that they have co-operated in the recovery proceedings. The firm applies on 14 March. The Principal Commissioner may waive or reduce the penalties and may stay recovery, after recording reasons. Since the aggregate reduced or waived exceeds Rs. 1,00,000, prior approval from the higher authority is required (sub-section (6)). The order is due within twelve months from the end of March, that is by 31 March the next year. If he proposes to reject, Prakash must first be heard.

Comparing the two powers

FeatureSub-sections (1) to (4)Sub-sections (5) to (9)
Which penaltyUnder section 439Penalty or penalties payable by the assessee
Who decidesPrincipal Commissioner or Commissioner, at discretionPrincipal Commissioner or Commissioner, after recording reasons
TriggerOwn motion or otherwiseApplication from the assessee
Core conditionsVoluntary, good-faith, full and true disclosure before detection; co-operation; tax and interest paid or arrangedGenuine hardship; co-operation in inquiry or recovery
ReliefReduce or waiveReduce, waive, stay or compound
Higher approvalIf income or disclosure exceeds Rs. 5,00,000If aggregate penalties reduced, waived or compounded exceed Rs. 1,00,000
RepeatNo relief for any other tax year after an orderThe text is silent
Time for orderThe text is silentTwelve months from the end of the month of receipt

The text is silent on the points marked. Section 469 sits beside the waiver of penalty in section 440 and the reasonable cause defence in section 470; see our article on section 440 and our post on section 470. For the procedure and time limits for imposing penalties see our article on sections 471 and 472.

Need help with a penalty waiver application?

The two powers have different conditions, approval limits and time limits, and an application must record the facts well. Our legal dispute resolution team helps prepare the disclosure or hardship case and follows it through to the order.

Key takeaways

  • Sub-sections (1) to (4) concern the section 439 penalty and need voluntary, good-faith, full and true disclosure before detection, with co-operation and payment or arrangements to pay.
  • Above Rs. 5,00,000 of income or disclosure, prior approval from the higher authority is mandatory.
  • A person who gets an order under sub-section (1) cannot claim relief for any other tax year.
  • Sub-section (5) allows reduction, waiver, stay or compounding on application and recorded reasons, for genuine hardship with co-operation.
  • Prior approval is needed if the aggregate under sub-section (5) exceeds Rs. 1,00,000.
  • The order on an application is due within twelve months; rejection needs a hearing; every order is final.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Income-tax Act, 2025 (30 of 2025) as amended by the Finance Act, 2026, as consulted on 2 October 2026. It explains the words of the Act only; the Income-tax Rules, 2026, notifications, circulars, later amendments and the way the tax authorities and courts apply these provisions should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 469

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which penalty can be reduced under section 469(1)?

The penalty imposed or imposable under section 439.

What disclosure counts?

A full and true disclosure made voluntarily and in good faith before the Assessing Officer detected any concealment or inaccuracy (clause (a)). Sub-section (2) deems a disclosure full and true if the difference between assessed and returned income does not attract section 439 penalties.

An honest "we were late" filed today is better than a perfect return filed next quarter.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 469: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The penalty imposed or imposable under section 439.

A full and true disclosure made voluntarily and in good faith before the Assessing Officer detected any concealment or inaccuracy (clause (a)). Sub-section (2) deems a disclosure full and true if the difference between assessed and returned income does not attract section 439 penalties.

Under sub-section (3) if the income or disclosure exceeds Rs. 5,00,000, and under sub-section (6) if the aggregate penalties reduced, waived or compounded under sub-section (5) exceed Rs. 1,00,000.

Not under sub-section (1): once an order is made in your favour you are not entitled to relief under this section for any other tax year.

Twelve months from the end of the month in which the application was received (sub-section (7)).

Sub-section (9) says every order made under the section is final and shall not be called into question by any court or any other authority.