Next due
20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 4 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 5 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 14 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 22 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 26 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 36 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 44 days
All due dates
GST

Section 67(11): Spot Seizure of Documents Produced

A separate power, exercised without an INS-01, over documents already produced — but it needs a recorded reason, a receipt, and an evasion belief.

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
24
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GST
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Sep 5, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources

You attend a summons and hand over the files you were asked to bring. The officer keeps them. That is not section 67(2) — it is a separate power with separate conditions.

Why it is a separate power

Section 67(2) deals with things that are secreted and have to be found. Section 67(11) deals with things that have been produced — voluntarily handed over, in response to a summons, a records demand or a letter.

The differences are structural:

s.67(2) seizures.67(11) seizure
SubjectGoods liable to confiscation; documents secretedAccounts, registers or documents produced before him
Belief requiredThings are secretedPerson has evaded or is attempting to evade payment of tax
AuthorisationINS-01 by Joint Commissioner or aboveNot required — the proper officer acts himself
Written reasonsOn the file behind the authorisationExpressly, "for reasons to be recorded in writing"
DocumentationINS-02 order + Rule 139(5) inventory"Shall grant a receipt"
RetentionSo long as necessary for examination, inquiry or proceedingsSo long as necessary for prosecution proceedings

The three conditions

1. Reasons to believe that the person has evaded or is attempting to evade the payment of any tax.

This is a higher and narrower belief than "useful or relevant to proceedings". It is about evasion — conduct, not merely a difference of view. A classification dispute, an interpretational disagreement, or an unreconciled figure is not, without more, evasion.

2. Reasons to be recorded in writing.

The sub-section says so expressly. Unlike s.67(2), where the reasons sit behind an authorisation, here the seizing officer must record his own reasons at the time.

3. A receipt shall be granted.

"Shall". The receipt is mandatory, and it is the taxpayer's only record of what was taken. Without it there is no way to establish what the department holds, no basis for a s.67(3) return request, and no way to prove the position later.

Ask for it before leaving the office. A receipt that describes items generically ("one bundle of papers") should be objected to and particularised — file names, periods, page counts.

"For prosecution"

The retention limb is unusual and worth reading closely: the documents are retained "for so long as may be necessary in connection with any proceedings under this Act or the rules made thereunder for prosecution."

The reference to prosecution aligns with the evasion trigger. This is an evidence-preservation power in a criminal context, not a routine documents-retention power.

Two practical consequences:

It signals the department's view. A s.67(11) seizure indicates that the matter is being treated as an evasion case, potentially heading towards s.132. That should change how the matter is handled from that point — including who advises, and how statements are given. Section 132 offences →

Retention is still bounded. "So long as may be necessary" is a limit, not a licence. And s.67(3) applies independently: documents produced by a taxable person or any other person which are not relied upon for the issue of a notice must be returned within thirty days of the notice. Section 67(3) →

What to do when documents are retained

  1. Ask which provision is being exercised. If it is s.67(11), the sub-section requires recorded reasons and a receipt.
  2. Ask for the receipt, itemised. Not "papers" — file descriptions, periods, page counts, and whether originals or copies.
  3. Ask for the reasons recorded. They may not be furnished, but the request establishes that recorded reasons were required.
  4. Hand over copies where possible, retaining originals — nothing obliges production of originals where copies serve, and the point should be put politely at the time.
  5. Take your own copies before attending. The most reliable protection is to have scanned everything before producing it. This is the single most useful habit in an investigation.
  6. Invoke s.67(5) for copies of what has been taken, in writing, stating the compliance obligations that need them. Section 67(5) →
  7. Invoke s.67(3) within days of any notice, for the return of everything not relied upon.

The related power: section 67(12) test purchase

Sitting alongside it is another standalone provision. Section 67(12): the Commissioner or an officer authorised by him may cause purchase of any goods or services by any person authorised by him from the business premises of any taxable person, to check the issue of tax invoices or bills of supply; and on return of the goods so purchased, the taxable person or the person in charge of the premises shall refund the amount so paid after cancelling any tax invoice or bill of supply issued earlier.

Two standalone anti-evasion tools, both operating without an INS-01, both narrowly defined. Section 67(12) test purchase →

Key takeaways

  • Section 67(11) is a separate seizure power over documents produced, needing no INS-01.
  • It requires reasons to believe the person has evaded or is attempting to evade tax — a narrower trigger than relevance.
  • Reasons must be recorded in writing, and a receipt must be granted.
  • Retention is for prosecution proceedings, which signals how the department is treating the matter.
  • Section 67(3) still requires return, within thirty days of a notice, of what is not relied upon.
  • Scan everything before producing it — the simplest and most effective protection.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on the CGST Act and Rules as amended to 31 March 2026 (ICAI Bare Law, 12th edition) and the ICAI Handbook on Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST (July 2025).

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 67

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can documents I produce be seized?

Yes, under section 67(11), where the proper officer has reasons to believe the person has evaded or is attempting to evade payment of tax.

Is an INS-01 authorisation needed?

No. Section 67(11) is exercised by the proper officer himself, but requires reasons to be recorded in writing.

Answer a GST notice within its time limit even if the answer is only a request for more time.

— TaxClue GST Desk

Section 67: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Yes, under section 67(11), where the proper officer has reasons to believe the person has evaded or is attempting to evade payment of tax.

No. Section 67(11) is exercised by the proper officer himself, but requires reasons to be recorded in writing.

Yes. The sub-section says the officer shall grant a receipt for the accounts, registers or documents seized.

For so long as may be necessary in connection with proceedings under the Act or rules for prosecution — and section 67(3) separately requires return of what is not relied upon within thirty days of a notice.

That the department is treating the matter as an evasion case, with prosecution in contemplation.

Scan every document before producing it, insist on an itemised receipt, and invoke section 67(5) for copies of what is held.