Next dueIncome Tax
21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 8 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 25 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 39 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 63 days 31 DECBelated / revised ITR · AY 2026-27in 79 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 2 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 7 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 17 days
All due dates
Income Tax Live

Sections 480–483 of the Income-tax Act, 2025: Offences of Not Furnishing a Search Return, Special Audit Default, False Statement and Falsified Books

Section 480: wilful failure to file the return for the block period: up to two years if the tax exceeds fifty lakh rupees, up to six months if it exceeds ten lakh rupees up to...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
13
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Income Tax
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 10, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Sections 480 to 483 are four offences in Chapter XXII. Section 480 is wilfully failing to furnish a return of undisclosed income for a block period after a search. Section 481 is wilfully failing to comply with a direction for special audit or valuation. Section 482 is a false statement in a verification, account or statement. Section 483 is falsifying books or documents to help another person evade tax. This article follows the text as per the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended by the Finance Act, 2026: sections 480 and 481 are as substituted, and sections 482 and 483 were amended, by that Act (sections 115, 116 and 117), with effect from 1 April 2026. If you have received a notice, see our legal dispute resolution service.

Section 480: return of undisclosed income for the block period

If a person wilfully fails to furnish in due time the return of income, setting forth his undisclosed income for the block period, which is required to be furnished by notice given under section 294(1)(a), he shall be punishable:

ClauseWhere the amount of taxPunishment
(a)Exceeds fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment for a term up to two years, or with fine, or with both
(b)Exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment up to six months, or with fine, or with both
(c)Any other caseFine

"Wilfully" is the key word: the failure must be deliberate, not merely late. The block period and the notice are in the search provisions (Chapter XVI, Part B), not explained here. The heading of section 480 in the Act is "Failure to furnish return of income setting forth undisclosed income". For the ordinary offence of not filing a return, see our post on section 479, whose current text was also amended by the Finance Act, 2026.

Example (amounts assumed). After a search, Ravi Impex receives a notice under section 294(1)(a) requiring a return of undisclosed income for the block period. It wilfully fails to furnish the return in due time. The tax on that undisclosed income is Rs. 18,00,000. Clause (b) applies: simple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both. If the tax had been Rs. 60,00,000, clause (a) would allow up to two years.

Section 481: direction for special audit or valuation

If a person wilfully fails to comply with a direction issued to him under section 268(5), he shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term up to six months, or with fine, or with both. The direction itself is in section 268(5) and is not explained here. The section prints no thresholds of tax; one punishment applies to every wilful failure.

Example (facts assumed). An Assessing Officer directs Kalyan Textiles, under section 268(5), to get its accounts specially audited. The proprietor wilfully ignores the direction. Section 481 applies.

Section 482: false statement in verification

If a person makes a statement in any verification under the Act or under any rule made under it, or delivers an account or statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false, or does not believe to be true, he shall be punishable:

ClauseWhere the amount of tax which would have been evaded if the statement or account had been accepted as truePunishment
(a)Exceeds fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment up to two years, or with fine, or with both
(b)Exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment up to six months, or with fine, or with both
(c)Any other caseFine

Three observations. First, the mental element has three forms: knows it to be false, believes it to be false, or does not believe it to be true. An honest mistake is outside the section. Second, the measure is the tax that would have been evaded if the statement had been accepted as true, not the tax actually lost. Third, the section covers "any verification under this Act", so it can attach to a return, a statement, or other verified documents.

Example (amounts assumed). Meghna Associates knowingly verifies a return that shows expenses it never incurred; had it been accepted, tax of Rs. 14,00,000 would have been evaded. Clause (b) applies. If the tax that would have been evaded were Rs. 8,00,000, clause (c) gives fine only.

Section 483: falsification of books of account or documents

Sub-section (1)

If any person (the first person) wilfully and with intent to enable any other person (the second person) to evade any tax, interest or penalty chargeable and imposable under the Act, makes or causes to be made any entry or statement which is false and which the first person either knows to be false or does not believe to be true, in any books of account or other document relevant to or useful in any proceedings against the first person or the second person under the Act, the first person shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term up to two years and with fine.

Sub-section (2)

For establishing the charge it shall not be necessary to prove that the second person has actually evaded any tax, penalty or interest.

The offence therefore turns on the first person's wilful act and intent. The punishment is both imprisonment and fine. Compare section 444, which provides a penalty for a false entry, in our article on sections 441, 442, 444 and 445.

Example (facts assumed). An accountant, Mr. Pillai, wilfully inserts a false purchase entry into a client's books, intending to help the client reduce tax. Sub-section (2) says the prosecution need not prove that the client actually evaded any tax. Mr. Pillai, as the first person, is punishable under sub-section (1).

Comparison

SectionOffenceMental elementPunishment
480Failing to furnish block-period returnWilfullyTiered by tax: up to two years / up to six months / fine
481Failing to comply with a direction under section 268(5)WilfullySimple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both
482False verification, account or statementKnows, believes or does not believe it trueTiered by tax that would have been evaded
483False entry in books to enable another to evadeWilfully, with intentSimple imprisonment up to two years and fine

For the other offences in this Chapter, see our posts on section 478 and section 479, and our articles on sections 473, 474, 475 and 477 and sections 484 to 486. The Chapter overview is in the Chapter XXII guide.

Need help with a notice on one of these offences?

Whether a failure was wilful, whether a statement was knowingly false and what tax would have been evaded are factual questions. Our legal dispute resolution team reviews the notice, the documents and the thresholds before you respond.

Key takeaways

  • Section 480: wilful failure to furnish the block-period return required by a notice under section 294(1)(a), punished in three tiers by the amount of tax.
  • Section 481: wilful failure to comply with a direction under section 268(5), up to six months, fine or both.
  • Section 482: a statement the person knows or believes to be false, or does not believe to be true; three tiers by the tax that would have been evaded.
  • Section 483: wilful false entries with intent to help another evade tax; simple imprisonment up to two years and fine; actual evasion need not be proved.
  • Sections 480 and 481 are as substituted, and sections 482 and 483 were amended, by the Finance Act, 2026.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Income-tax Act, 2025 (30 of 2025) as amended by the Finance Act, 2026, as consulted on 2 October 2026. It explains the words of the Act only; the Income-tax Rules, 2026, notifications, circulars, later amendments and the way the tax authorities and courts apply these provisions should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 480

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which offence covers failing to file a return after a search?

Section 480, for a wilful failure to furnish in due time the return of undisclosed income for the block period required by a notice under section 294(1)(a).

What is the punishment under section 481?

Simple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both, for wilful failure to comply with a direction under section 268(5).

Respond to an intimation while it is still an intimation.

— TaxClue Direct Tax Desk

Sections 480: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 480, for a wilful failure to furnish in due time the return of undisclosed income for the block period required by a notice under section 294(1)(a).

Simple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both, for wilful failure to comply with a direction under section 268(5).

A statement in a verification, or an account or statement delivered, which the person knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true.

By the amount of tax which would have been evaded if the statement or account had been accepted as true: above fifty lakh rupees, between ten and fifty lakh rupees, or any other case.

No. Section 483(2) says it is not necessary to prove that the second person has actually evaded any tax, penalty or interest.

The person who makes or causes to be made the false entry or statement with intent to enable another to evade.