Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 2 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 10 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 14 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 18 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 24 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 32 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 48 days
All due dates
GST

Sections 122(2) and 122(3): The Other Two Penalty Sub-Sections

One mirrors the demand penalties; the other reaches people who are not the taxpayer at all — including anyone who fails to appear on a summons.

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Questions
6 answered
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GST
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Sep 5, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 122(1) gets the attention. The two sub-sections after it are more likely to arise — one on every demand, and the other against people who are not the taxpayer.

Section 122(2): the penalty that sits under every demand

The structure mirrors s.74A(5) exactly:

Basiss.122(2)s.74A(5)
Non-fraud₹10,000 or 10% of tax due, higher10% of tax due or ₹10,000, higher
Fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression₹10,000 or the tax due, higherThe tax due

So the same conduct generates a penalty under both. Which is precisely why s.75(13) exists: where any penalty is imposed under s.73, s.74 or s.74A, no penalty for the same act or omission shall be imposed on the same person under any other provision of this Act.

The practical position: where a demand is adjudicated under s.74A and its penalty imposed, a separate s.122(2) penalty for the same short payment is barred. A notice proposing both should be met with s.75(13) in terms. Section 75(7) →

Where s.122(2) does operate independently: where a penalty is imposed without a demand under s.73, s.74 or s.74A — for example where the tax has already been paid but the penalty is pursued separately under s.127.

Section 122(3): the five acts, and who they reach

"Any person" — not a taxable person, not a registered person. Anyone.

(a) Aids or abets any of the offences specified in clauses (i) to (xxi) of sub-section (1). The full twenty-one. This is the clause under which advisers, employees, transporters and counterparties are drawn into penalty proceedings.

(b) Acquires possession of, or in any way concerns himself in transporting, removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, supplying, or purchasing or in any other manner deals with any goods which he knows or has reasons to believe are liable to confiscation.

Note the mental element: knows or has reasons to believe. A transporter or warehouse keeper handling goods in the ordinary course, without that knowledge or reason to believe, is outside the clause — and the contemporaneous record of what documents were checked is what establishes it. Section 130 confiscation →

(c) Receives or is in any way concerned with the supply of, or in any other manner deals in any supply of services which he knows or has reasons to believe are in contravention of any provisions of this Act or the rules. The services analogue of clause (b), with the same mental element.

(d) Fails to appear before the officer of central tax, when issued with a summons for appearance to give evidence or produce a document in an inquiry.

This is the clause that matters most in practice, because it attaches to a routine event. Section 70(1A), inserted w.e.f. 01.11.2024, makes attendance binding; s.122(3)(d) supplies the penalty. Non-attendance is never the right response to a summons — reply in writing before the date, give the reason, and propose alternatives. Section 70 summons →

(e) Fails to issue an invoice in accordance with the provisions of this Act or the rules, or fails to account for an invoice in his books of account.

The penalty: "may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees."

"May extend to" — why section 126 applies here

Because s.122(3) sets a ceiling rather than a fixed sum or percentage, s.126(6) does not disapply the general disciplines. So the whole of s.126 governs the quantum:

  • no penalty for a minor breach — tax involved under ₹5,000 — or for an easily rectifiable documentation error made without fraudulent intent or gross negligence;
  • the penalty must be commensurate with the degree and severity of the breach;
  • no penalty without a hearing;
  • the order must specify the nature of the breach and the applicable law;
  • voluntary disclosure before discovery is a mitigating factor.

Contrast s.122(1) and s.122(2), both of which produce an amount by formula and are therefore within the s.126(6) carve-out. Section 126 →

Section 122(1B): the e-commerce operator penalty

Inserted by the Finance Act, 2023 w.e.f. 01.10.2023, and its opening words substituted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, effective retrospectively from 01.10.2023, notified through Notification No. 17/2024-CT dated 27.09.2024, to read "Any electronic commerce operator, who is liable to collect tax at source under section 52" — replacing the earlier "Any electronic commerce operator who".

The substitution narrows it. Only an ECO liable to collect TCS under s.52 is within the sub-section.

The three acts:

  • (i) allows a supply through it by an unregistered person, other than a person exempted from registration by a notification;
  • (ii) allows an inter-State supply through it by a person not eligible to make such supply;
  • (iii) fails to furnish the correct details in the s.52(4) statement of any outward supply of goods effected through it by a person exempted from obtaining registration.

The penalty: ₹10,000, or an amount equivalent to the tax involved had such supply been made by a registered person other than a person paying tax under s.10, whichever is higher.

Note the comparator: the tax that would have been payable by a regular registered person — expressly not a composition taxpayer. E-commerce operators →

Key takeaways

  • Section 122(2) mirrors the s.74A(5) penalty — 10% or ₹10,000 for non-fraud, the tax due or ₹10,000 for fraud.
  • Section 75(13) bars it where a penalty is imposed under s.73, s.74 or s.74A for the same act.
  • Section 122(3) reaches any person, with a penalty "which may extend to" ₹25,000.
  • Clause (d) penalises failure to appear on a summons — read with the binding attendance duty in s.70(1A).
  • Clauses (b) and (c) require the person to know or have reasons to believe — a real defence for transporters and intermediaries.
  • Because s.122(3) sets a ceiling, the whole of s.126 applies to its quantum.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on the CGST Act as amended to 31 March 2026 (ICAI Bare Law, 12th edition).

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 122

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is the penalty under section 122(2)?

Ten thousand rupees or ten per cent of the tax due, whichever is higher, for a non-fraud case; and ten thousand rupees or the tax due, whichever is higher, for fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression.

Can it be imposed alongside a section 74A penalty?

No. Section 75(13) bars a penalty under any other provision for the same act or omission where a penalty is imposed under section 73, 74 or 74A.

Answer a GST notice within its time limit even if the answer is only a request for more time.

— TaxClue GST Desk

Sections 122: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Ten thousand rupees or ten per cent of the tax due, whichever is higher, for a non-fraud case; and ten thousand rupees or the tax due, whichever is higher, for fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression.

No. Section 75(13) bars a penalty under any other provision for the same act or omission where a penalty is imposed under section 73, 74 or 74A.

Any person — including those who aid or abet an offence, deal with goods or services they know or have reason to believe are in contravention, fail to appear on a summons, or fail to issue or account for an invoice.

Section 122(3)(d) provides a penalty which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees.

Yes. Because the penalty is expressed as a ceiling rather than a fixed sum or percentage, section 126(6) does not disapply the general disciplines.

Only those liable to collect tax at source under section 52, following the substitution effective retrospectively from 1 October 2023.