Next due
15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026tomorrow 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 6 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 7 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 16 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 24 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 28 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 38 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 46 days
All due dates

Rules 120 to 122 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (Central) Rules, 2026: unfit persons, cost of examination and exemptions

A person declared unfit (initial, periodical or after re-examination) for mines, a category of mines or specified operations shall not be employed or continue to be employed there...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
10
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 13, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Rule 120 bars the employment of a person declared unfit for mines after thirty days unless an appeal is filed, with a six-month continuation proviso. Rule 121 puts the cost of the examination on the mine employer, and rule 122 lists mine staff exempt from certain working-hours provisions of the Code.

Where they fit

These are the last three rules in the mine medical block (rules 109 to 122). The unfit finding comes from the examination under rules 109 and 113; the appeal comes under rule 117. See our rules 117 to 119 article. For a compliance review of how your mine handles unfit certificates, our labour law compliance service is the starting point.

The Central Rules apply where the Central Government is the appropriate Government. Where the State Government is the appropriate Government, the State's own OSH rules apply.

Rule 120: unfit persons not to be employed

Where a person has been declared unfit for employment in mines, in a particular category of mines or in any specified operations in a mine, as a result of:

  • an initial medical examination,
  • a periodical medical examination, or
  • medical re-examination,

the person "shall not be employed or continue to be employed" in the mine, category or operation "after the expiry of thirty days from the date of medical examination unless such person has filed an appeal against the declaration".

Points to note:

  • Thirty days from the date of examination. Rule 117 gives thirty days from receipt of the certificate to appeal. Rule 120 counts from the date of examination. The two start points differ; a prudent employer treats the earlier date as the working limit for pulling a person off the affected work unless an appeal is in hand. This is our reading; the text does not reconcile them.
  • Scope of the bar. It is tied to what the person was declared unfit for: all mines, a category, or a specified operation. A person unfit for below-ground work, for example, may still be employed on surface work, as Form IX lets the examiner specify.
  • Appeal keeps the person in place. The words "unless such person has filed an appeal" mean the bar does not operate while the appeal is on. The rule does not say what happens after the board's decision; the post-appeal position follows the Form X finding.
  • After re-examination. The rule also applies to a finding after medical re-examination, so a Form X "unfit" ends the exception.

The six-month proviso. If the qualified medical practitioner (initial or periodical) or the appellate medical board (re-examination of persons already in employment) is of the opinion that the disability is "of such a nature and degree that it will not seriously affect or interfere with the normal discharge of their duties", it "may recommend their continuation in employment in the mine for a period not exceeding six months". During this time the person may get the disability "cured or controlled" and appear for another medical examination after six months and be declared fit.

FeatureText
Who recommendsThe qualified medical practitioner or appellate medical board
Whose cases"persons already in employment" (re-examination reference); the proviso also names initial and periodical examination
Maximum periodSix months
PurposeCure or control the disability
Next stepAnother medical examination after six months

A drafting point: the proviso opens with initial and periodical examination and the board, then speaks of "persons already in employment". It is not clear whether a fresh candidate can be given the six months. We read the text as aimed at people already employed, and flag the point for confirmation. Form IX's option (c), which lets the examiner say the employee may be permitted or not permitted to carry on duties during the re-examination period, is how the recommendation is recorded.

Rule 121: cost

"The cost of medical examination under these rules, shall be borne by the employer of the mine except in case the person is declared unfit for employment in mines after re-examination by appellate medical board."

  • The default is the employer.
  • The only exception is a person declared unfit after re-examination by the board.
  • It works with rule 117(3) and (4): the appellant pays the board's fee, and if found fit, the employer reimburses in full.
  • The rule does not say who bears the cost where the person is declared unfit and then does not appeal. Read literally, the employer bears it, since the exception is limited to re-examination.
  • Section 6(1)(g) of the Code (no charge on an employee for safety and health provisions) is relevant to deductions; see our section 6 article.

Rule 122: exemptions from hours and limitation of employment

Section 71 of the Code lets the Central Government make rules exempting certain persons or categories of persons employed in mines from s.25(1), s.26(1), s.30 and s.31(1) (see our sections 71 to 73 article). Rule 122 is that exemption: it exempts the persons listed from "sub-section (1) of section 25, sub-section (1) of section 26, section 30 and sub-section (1) of section 31" of the Code. See our articles on section 25, section 26, sections 29 and 30 and section 31.

ClausePersons exempted
(i)Persons holding a position of supervision or management or like position, employed in a confidential capacity
(ii)Manager, deputy manager, installation manager, fire officer, assistant manager, ventilation officer, safety officer, information technology, instrumentation and communication officials
(iii)Mining, electrical and mechanical engineer
(iv)Mining supervisor, assistant mining supervisor and supervisor in oil mines
(v)Mechanical and electrical foreman and electrical and mechanical supervisor
(vi)Surveyor and assistant surveyor
(vii)Qualified medical practitioner, dresser, compounder, chemist, assayer, metallurgist and welfare or personnel officer
(viii)Any other person specified by the Central Government through general or special order

The heading says "in respect of the following", but the rule does not then set out any further list of matters; the exemption is from the four named provisions. This looks like a drafting slip, flagged here without correction. Also note the placement: an hours exemption sits in the medical block, although it has no medical content.

Practical examples

Example 1. A driller is declared unfit for below-ground work on 1 July. He files an appeal on 15 July. He may continue until the board decides, since an appeal has been filed. Without an appeal he could not be kept on that work after 31 July.

Example 2. A surface clerk with controlled hypertension is recommended for continuation for six months. He is re-examined after six months.

Example 3. A mine's ventilation officer works long hours on an emergency. Rule 122(ii) exempts him from the daily-hours limit in s.25(1) and the other named provisions.

Need help with unfit-person cases?

Handling an unfit certificate means balancing the worker's rights, appeal timelines and the employer's duty under rule 120. Our labour law compliance team can help you build a decision log and check your records.

Key takeaways

  • An unfit person may not be employed or continued after thirty days from the date of examination unless an appeal has been filed.
  • A doctor or the board may recommend up to six months' continuation to cure or control a disability.
  • The mine employer bears the cost, except where the board finds the person unfit on re-examination.
  • Rule 122 exempts listed officers and technical staff from ss.25(1), 26(1), 30 and 31(1).

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 345(E), 8 May 2026), as on 30 September 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; some provisions may be notified later, and State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Rules 120 to 122

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can an unfit person keep working?

Not after thirty days from the date of examination, unless an appeal has been filed (rule 120).

Is there any relaxation?

Yes, the proviso lets the doctor or board recommend continuation for a period not exceeding six months.

Good compliance is boring by design; the drama starts only when something has been skipped.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Rules 120 to 122: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Not after thirty days from the date of examination, unless an appeal has been filed (rule 120).

Yes, the proviso lets the doctor or board recommend continuation for a period not exceeding six months.

The mine employer, except where the person is declared unfit after re-examination by the appellate medical board (rule 121).

No. Only from s.25(1), s.26(1), s.30 and s.31(1).

Yes, clause (viii) allows any other person specified by general or special order.