Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 2 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 10 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 14 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 18 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 24 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 32 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 48 days
All due dates

Homebuyers as Financial Creditors Under the IBC

An amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project is deemed to have the commercial effect of borrowing since 6 June 2018. But in Ajay Walia v. Sunworld Residency the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Questions
6 answered
  • High Complexity
Topic
IBC Insolvency
Published
September 7, 2026
Last updated
Sep 7, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources

Before the amendment: Vinod Awasthy

In Col. Vinod Awasthy v. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. the petitioner had booked a flat which the developer failed to deliver by the due date. The NCLT held that operational debt under section 5(21) is confined to four categories — goods, services, employment and Government dues — and that the framers had not defined operational debt as any debt other than financial debt. A flat purchaser was therefore neither an operational creditor nor, on the definition as it then stood, a financial creditor.

The 6 June 2018 Explanation

The gap was closed by an Explanation inserted into the definition of financial debt with effect from 6 June 2018: any amount raised under a real estate project from an allottee shall be deemed to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing.

That deeming is what makes homebuyers as financial creditors possible. It does not say the buyer lent money; it says the money the developer took has the commercial effect of a borrowing, which brings it within section 5(8).

The tripartite agreement takes the status away again

Ajay Walia v. Sunworld Residency Private Limited (NCLT Allahabad) addresses the ordinary case where the buyer funds the purchase with a bank loan.

That arrangement runs through a tripartite agreement between the homebuyer, the builder and the bank, under which the buyer creates a third-party interest in favour of the bank. The NCLT held that a homebuyer who has subrogated his rights in favour of the bank cannot be considered a financial creditor. The claim against the developer has moved; the buyer keeps the obligation to repay the bank but not the standing to prove as a financial creditor.

Two further points from the same case

Ajay Walia adds two qualifications that shape how homebuyers as financial creditors actually participate:

  • Homebuyers are likely to be unsecured financial creditors in any case. Being a financial creditor secures a seat and a voting share in the committee of creditors; it does not secure the debt.
  • The March 2020 amendment requires not less than 100 homebuyers or 10% of them to initiate insolvency against a builder or developer.

Why the numerical threshold was introduced

Once homebuyers as financial creditors became the norm, a single dissatisfied allottee could file under section 7 and put an entire project into a CIRP — with the moratorium halting construction for every other buyer in the same development. The 100-or-10% requirement means the trigger has to reflect a body of allottees rather than one, so that the remedy is not worse for the majority than the delay complained of.

Where a real estate arrangement is neither

In Jesleen Kaur Papneja v. Raheja Developers Ltd. the NCLT considered a joint development agreement between landowners and a developer involving development of land and profit sharing. It held:

  • the definition of claim under the Code is comprehensive but focused on claims in respect of the provision of goods and services;
  • joint development agreements do not qualify as financial debt;
  • collaboration and joint development agreements may contain elements resembling loans, but are characterised by mutual legal relationships for consideration rather than operational debt, and the focus is on the real intention of the parties; and
  • agreements must be read collectively, for their overall purpose and structure, rather than in isolation.

Checklist for a homebuyer's claim

  1. Confirm the amount was raised from an allottee under a real estate project — the deeming Explanation applies to that, not to every property payment.
  2. Check for a tripartite agreement and whether rights have been subrogated to a lender.
  3. For an application, assemble 100 allottees or 10% of them.
  4. Expect an unsecured financial creditor's position in the committee, not a secured one.

Common mistakes

  • Treating all flat purchasers as homebuyers as financial creditors regardless of how the purchase was funded.
  • Filing a single-allottee section 7 application after the March 2020 amendment.
  • Treating a landowner under a joint development agreement as a financial creditor.
  • Expecting security for a homebuyer's admitted claim.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Homebuyers as Financial Creditors

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Are homebuyers financial creditors?

The Explanation inserted into the definition of financial debt with effect from 6 June 2018 deems any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing.

What was the position before that?

In Col. Vinod Awasthy v. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. the NCLT held operational debt was confined to goods, services, employment and Government dues, so a flat purchaser fell outside it.

If a rule seems to have changed, check the date of what you are reading before you act on it.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Homebuyers as Financial Creditors: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Explanation inserted into the definition of financial debt with effect from 6 June 2018 deems any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing.

In Col. Vinod Awasthy v. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. the NCLT held operational debt was confined to goods, services, employment and Government dues, so a flat purchaser fell outside it.

Where a homebuyer takes a bank loan to buy the flat, a tripartite agreement between buyer, builder and bank creates a third-party interest in favour of the bank. In Ajay Walia v. Sunworld Residency the NCLT held that a homebuyer who has subrogated rights in favour of the bank cannot be considered a financial creditor.

Homebuyers are likely to be unsecured financial creditors in any case.

The March 2020 amendment requires not less than 100 allottees or 10% of the allottees to jointly initiate insolvency against a builder or developer.

No. In Jesleen Kaur Papneja v. Raheja Developers Ltd. the NCLT held that joint development agreements do not qualify as financial debt under the IBC.