Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26tomorrow 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 9 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 13 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 17 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 22 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 23 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 31 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 47 days
All due dates

CIRP Costs and the Committee's Duty to Fund the Process

The committee of creditors is primarily responsible for funding the corporate debtor to keep it a going concern. A financial creditor that refuses to contribute its proportionate...

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Questions
6 answered
  • High Complexity
Topic
IBC Insolvency
Published
September 7, 2026
Last updated
Sep 7, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources

The costs can be paid as they arise — IDBI Bank v. Manor Floatel

IDBI Bank initiated proceedings against Manor Floatel Limited over failure to repay a loan exceeding Rs. 32 crore, taken to set up a floating hotel on the Ganges, and the CIRP was admitted.

Among the questions answered was that insolvency resolution process cost may be paid during the CIRP period also, and does not necessarily have to be included in the resolution plan.

This matters because the alternative reading — that CIRP costs are settled only when a plan is approved — would leave the professional, the valuers and the debtor's suppliers unpaid for the whole of a 330-day process, on the chance that a plan eventually materialises.

The committee must fund the going concern — Dakshin Gujarat Vij

The NCLT held that:

  • the committee of creditors is primarily responsible for funding the corporate debtor to maintain it as a going concern;
  • CIRP expenses initially paid by the applicant must be reimbursed by the CoC if ratified;
  • CoC members are directed to induct funds based on their voting shares to cover essential operational costs categorised as Insolvency Resolution Process Costs; and
  • if bank authorities do not cooperate in releasing funds for operations, the resolution professional must report this to the regulatory authorities.
Refusing to fund can cost a creditor its claim

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. v. Noble Resourcing Business and Solution Pvt. Ltd. is the strongest statement of the principle. The committee resolved that CIRP costs would be shared proportionately by the financial creditors; one creditor refused.

The Adjudicating Authority observed that for effective continuation of the process the financial creditors constituting the committee have to contribute to the expenses, fees and other costs, otherwise the whole process would come to a halt. It went further: if a creditor is not inclined to contribute to the cost of the process, "then we are doubtful as to how their claim could be considered in the whole process."

It directed the non-contributing creditor to contribute 42.78% of the running CIRP cost as approved by the committee, and held that if it failed to contribute, its claim in the CIR process would not be considered.

Liquidation costs where there is nothing to draw on — Hind Motors

Hind Motors India Limited was ordered into liquidation by the NCLT on 12 September 2017. The Adjudicating Authority noted that the corporate debtor had no liquid assets, making it difficult to meet the expenses of liquidation.

It therefore directed that the expenses of the public announcement and service of process incurred by the liquidator be borne by Union Bank of India at first instance, and that those sums would form part of liquidation costs. It clarified that the liquidator shall be paid a fee in accordance with the Regulations.

The pattern across the four decisions

QuestionPosition
When are CIRP costs paid?During the process, not only through the plan
Who funds the going concern?The committee of creditors, primarily
On what basis?Proportionate to voting share
What if one creditor refuses?Directed to contribute; claim may not be considered if it does not
What if there are no liquid assets in liquidation?A creditor may be directed to bear costs at first instance, recoverable as liquidation cost

Running through all of them is the same idea: CIRP costs rank ahead of everyone in the distribution, so a creditor advancing them is not making a gift. It is funding, in priority, the process from which its own recovery comes.

Practical points for a resolution professional

  • Put a budget and a funding resolution to the committee early, allocated by voting share.
  • Obtain ratification of expenses advanced by the applicant — reimbursement follows ratification.
  • Where a bank will not release operating funds, report it to the regulator rather than absorbing the delay.
  • In a liquidation with no liquid assets, apply for a direction that a creditor bear the initial costs as liquidation cost.

Common mistakes

  • Deferring all CIRP costs to the resolution plan.
  • Accepting a creditor's refusal to contribute as a commercial choice with no consequence.
  • Advancing expenses personally without committee ratification.
  • Letting operations stop because the debtor's bank will not release funds, without reporting it.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About CIRP Costs

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Must CIRP costs be paid through the resolution plan?

No. In IDBI Bank v. Manor Floatel Limited the NCLT held that insolvency resolution process cost may be paid during the CIRP period also and does not necessarily have to be included in the resolution plan.

Who is responsible for funding the corporate debtor?

In Dakshin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. v. Jitendra Kumar Yadav the NCLT held the committee of creditors is primarily responsible for funding the corporate debtor to maintain it as a going concern.

A claim is only as good as the documents filed with it.

— TaxClue Insolvency Desk

CIRP Costs: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No. In IDBI Bank v. Manor Floatel Limited the NCLT held that insolvency resolution process cost may be paid during the CIRP period also and does not necessarily have to be included in the resolution plan.

In Dakshin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. v. Jitendra Kumar Yadav the NCLT held the committee of creditors is primarily responsible for funding the corporate debtor to maintain it as a going concern.

CIRP expenses initially paid by the applicant must be reimbursed by the CoC if ratified, and CoC members are directed to induct funds based on their voting shares to cover essential operational costs categorised as IRPC.

The resolution professional is required to report this to the regulatory authorities.

In Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. v. Noble Resourcing Business and Solution Pvt. Ltd. the Adjudicating Authority directed the non-contributing creditor to contribute 42.78% proportionately, and said that if it failed to contribute its claim in the CIRP would not be considered.

In Hind Motors India Limited the Adjudicating Authority directed that the expenses of public announcement and service of process incurred by the liquidator be borne by Union Bank of India at first instance, forming part of liquidation costs, with the liquidator paid a fee in accordance with the Regulations.