Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 2 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 10 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 14 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 18 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 23 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 24 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 32 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 48 days
All due dates

Building Valuation Under the DRC Method in CIRP Assignments

Buildings are depreciating assets whose value turns on condition, remaining life and functional utility. Where market comparables are unavailable — the usual position for...

Published
Updated
Reading time
4 min
Questions
6 answered
  • High Complexity
Topic
IBC Insolvency
Published
September 7, 2026
Last updated
Sep 7, 2026
Reading time
4 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources

Three approaches to building valuation

ApproachWhen appropriate
Sales comparisonRecent market transactions for comparable built-up properties — commercial buildings, office premises, residential property and standard industrial buildings in active real estate markets
Cost (Depreciated Replacement Cost)Specialised industrial buildings, process structures, warehouses and storage facilities where reliable comparables are limited. In many CIRP assignments involving manufacturing entities, this is the primary approach
IncomeWhere the building itself is income-generating — leased commercial property, logistics facilities, hotels or similar specialised real estate

The five DRC steps

  1. Estimate current replacement cost — the cost of constructing an equivalent asset at the valuation date, using CPWD or State PWD Schedule of Rates, MORTH specifications for roads and civil structures, independent quantity surveyor estimates, or recent construction cost evidence.
  2. Assess physical depreciation — age, wear and tear, maintenance history and observed condition, with deferred maintenance from prolonged financial distress separately considered.
  3. Assess functional and economic obsolescence — outdated design, inefficient layout, excess capacity, technological changes, reduced demand for the current use.
  4. Determine depreciated replacement cost — apply both adjustments.
  5. Consider liquidation-specific adjustments — buyer pool, marketability, alternative use potential, demolition requirements and comparable auction or distressed-sale outcomes.
Two depreciation adjustments, and only one comes from the inspection

Physical depreciation is observable — the valuer walks the structure and records its condition. Functional and economic obsolescence is not: it asks whether the building is suitable for its intended purpose and whether alternative uses are feasible.

A factory shed in excellent structural condition can carry heavy functional obsolescence — inadequate headroom, single-storey layout, crane rails sized for equipment nobody uses. The illustrative write-up shows exactly this, applying physical depreciation for age and observed condition and a separate functional obsolescence percentage for the layout.

Reporting only the age-based depreciation is the more common error, and it systematically overstates the value of specialised industrial structures — which are precisely the buildings for which the DRC method is being used in the first place.

What a building valuation must look at

  • construction type and quality; age and residual useful life;
  • structural condition and maintenance history;
  • functional utility and adaptability for alternative use;
  • occupancy status and actual utilisation;
  • statutory approvals, completion certificates and occupancy certificates;
  • the relationship between building value and the underlying land value;
  • unauthorised construction or deviations from approved plans;
  • occupancy disputes, unauthorised possession or access restrictions;
  • environmental and fire safety compliance; and
  • uncertainty regarding restoration, rehabilitation or recommissioning costs.

The building-to-land relationship

It appears in the list almost in passing and matters more than its position suggests. Where a structure is functionally obsolete and the land beneath it has redevelopment potential, the building may contribute nothing — or negative value, once demolition costs are recognised as part of the liquidation adjustment.

Building valuation risk indicators

RiskIndicators
LowComplete approvals, good physical condition, active utility, adequate documentation
ModerateDeferred maintenance, minor regulatory deviations, limited condition evidence, partial documentation gaps
HighUnauthorised construction, significant deterioration, incomplete structures, occupancy disputes, regulatory non-compliance, highly specialised structures with limited alternative use

Common mistakes

  • Basing the building valuation on age-based depreciation alone, with no obsolescence assessment.
  • Using a Schedule of Rates figure without adjusting for location and specification.
  • Valuing structures built without approvals as though compliant.
  • Omitting demolition cost from the liquidation conclusion on an obsolete structure.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Building Valuation

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Which approaches apply to buildings?

The Sales Comparison Approach where recent transactions for comparable built-up properties exist; the Cost Approach using the Depreciated Replacement Cost method for specialised industrial buildings, process structures and warehouses where comparables are limited; and the Income Approach where the building itself is income-generating, such as leased commercial property, logistics facilities or hotels.

What are the DRC steps?

Estimate current replacement cost; assess physical depreciation; assess functional and economic obsolescence; determine depreciated replacement cost; and consider liquidation-specific adjustments where applicable.

A resolution plan is judged on feasibility, not on optimism.

— TaxClue Insolvency Desk

Building Valuation: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The Sales Comparison Approach where recent transactions for comparable built-up properties exist; the Cost Approach using the Depreciated Replacement Cost method for specialised industrial buildings, process structures and warehouses where comparables are limited; and the Income Approach where the building itself is income-generating, such as leased commercial property, logistics facilities or hotels.

Estimate current replacement cost; assess physical depreciation; assess functional and economic obsolescence; determine depreciated replacement cost; and consider liquidation-specific adjustments where applicable.

CPWD or State PWD Schedule of Rates, MORTH specifications for roads and civil structures, independent quantity surveyor estimates, or recent construction cost evidence for similar structures — adjusted for location, specification, age, condition and market factors.

Whether the structure remains suitable for its intended purpose and whether alternative uses are feasible, having regard to outdated design, inefficient layout, excess capacity, technological changes and reduced demand for the current use.

Unauthorised construction, significant deterioration, incomplete structures, occupancy disputes, regulatory non-compliance or highly specialised structures with limited alternative use.

Deterioration arising from age, wear and tear, maintenance history and observed condition should be evaluated, and deferred maintenance arising from prolonged financial distress considered separately.