Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 5 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 13 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 17 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 21 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 26 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 27 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 35 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 51 days
All due dates

Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Appointment of Arbitrators

The parties may agree their own appointment procedure (section 11(2)). Without one, a tribunal of three is formed by each party appointing one arbitrator and the two choosing the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Questions
7 answered
  • High Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Arbitration
Published
March 23, 2026
Last updated
Mar 23, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: March 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Section 11 decides how the arbitral tribunal comes into being: by the procedure the parties agreed, by the default steps the section supplies, and, when either breaks down, on a request to the Supreme Court or the High Court. This explainer goes through sub-sections (1) to (14) exactly as per the India Code consolidated text consulted. Every footnote that text prints under section 11 cites Act 3 of 2016, s. 6, with effect from 23-10-2015; later amendments should be checked. If the other side is not appointing its arbitrator, our legal dispute resolution team can take the matter forward.

Sub-sections (1) to (3): nationality, agreed procedure, default procedure

Sub-section (1). A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Sub-section (2). Subject to sub-section (6), the parties are at liberty to agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators. The number itself is settled under section 10: it must not be an even number, and if the parties fix none the tribunal is a sole arbitrator. See sections 10 and 11A.

Sub-section (3). Failing any agreement on procedure, in an arbitration with three arbitrators each party appoints one arbitrator, and the two appointed arbitrators appoint the third, who acts as the presiding arbitrator.

Sub-sections (4) to (6): when the appointment stalls

Sub-sectionSituationTrigger as printedWho acts
(4)(a)Three arbitrators, no agreed procedure; a party does not appointThirty days from the receipt of a request to do so from the other partyOn request of a party, the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court
(4)(b)The two appointed arbitrators do not agree on the thirdThirty days from the date of their appointmentSame
(5)Sole arbitrator, no agreed procedure; the parties do not agree on the arbitratorThirty days from receipt of a request by one party from the other party to so agreeSame
(6)An agreed procedure exists but a party, the parties or the two arbitrators, or a person or institution, does not act or agree as that procedure requiresNo period is printedA party may request the same authority to take the necessary measure

Sub-section (6) carries one qualification: the request lies unless the agreement on the appointment procedure provides other means for securing the appointment. So a clause that names a fall-back step has to be followed first.

Sub-section (6) prints no number of days. Where the parties have agreed a procedure, the time for each step comes from that procedure.

Sub-sections (6A) and (6B): what is examined

Sub-section (6A). The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, while considering any application under sub-section (4), (5) or (6), shall, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any Court, confine to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement. What an arbitration agreement is, and when it is in writing, is in section 7.

Sub-section (6B). The designation of any person or institution by the Supreme Court or the High Court for the purposes of this section shall not be regarded as a delegation of judicial power by that Court.

Sub-sections (7) and (8): finality and disclosure

Sub-section (7). A decision on a matter entrusted by sub-section (4), (5) or (6) to the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court is final, and no appeal including Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against such decision.

Sub-section (8). Before appointing an arbitrator, that authority shall seek a disclosure in writing from the prospective arbitrator in terms of section 12(1), and have due regard to:

  • any qualifications required for the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties; and
  • the contents of the disclosure and other considerations as are likely to secure the appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator.

The disclosure itself is explained in section 12: grounds for challenge and disclosure, and its form in the Sixth Schedule.

Sub-sections (9) to (12): international cases, schemes and which Court

Sub-section (9). In the appointment of a sole or third arbitrator in an international commercial arbitration, the Supreme Court or the person or institution designated by that Court may appoint an arbitrator of a nationality other than the nationalities of the parties where the parties belong to different nationalities.

Sub-section (10). The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court may make such scheme as it may deem appropriate for dealing with matters entrusted to it by sub-section (4), (5) or (6). No scheme is printed in the text consulted.

Sub-section (11). Where more than one request has been made under sub-section (4), (5) or (6) to different High Courts or their designates, the High Court or its designate to whom the request has been first made shall alone be competent to decide on the request.

Sub-section (12). This sub-section tells you which Court the earlier sub-sections mean.

Kind of arbitration"Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court" in sub-sections (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and (10) means
International commercial arbitration (clause (a))The Supreme Court
Any other arbitration (clause (b))The High Court within whose local limits the principal Civil Court referred to in section 2(1)(e) is situate; where the High Court itself is the Court referred to in that clause, that High Court

"International commercial arbitration" and "Court" are defined in section 2.

Sub-sections (13) and (14): time and fees

Sub-section (13). An application under section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator or arbitrators shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, and an endeavour shall be made to dispose of the matter within a period of sixty days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party.

Sub-section (14). For determining the fees of the arbitral tribunal and the manner of payment, the High Court may frame such rules as may be necessary, after taking into consideration the rates specified in the Fourth Schedule. The Explanation says the sub-section does not apply to international commercial arbitration, nor to other arbitrations where the parties have agreed that fees be determined as per the rules of an arbitral institution. The rates are in the Fourth Schedule. No High Court rules are printed in the text consulted.

What the footnotes show

ProvisionFootnote as printed
Authority named in (4), (5), (6)Subs. by Act 3 of 2016, s. 6, for "the Chief Justice or any person or institution designated by him" (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)
(6A), (6B)Ins. by s. 6, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)
(7), closing wordsSubs. by s. 6, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)
(8), (10), (12)Each substituted by s. 6, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)
(9), (11), words naming the authoritySubs. by s. 6, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)
(13), (14)Ins. by s. 6, ibid. (w.e.f. 23-10-2015)

Printing points in the text

  • Sub-section (4) ends with a semicolon after the words naming the authority.
  • Sub-section (11) still opens with the words "to the Chief Justices of different High Courts or their designates" before the substituted words "different High Courts or their designates", so the phrase appears twice.
  • Sub-section (9) names only the Supreme Court or its designate, and sub-section (12) does not list sub-section (9).
  • Sub-section (13) prints "as the case maybe".
  • The footnote to sub-section (9) quotes the old words as "the Chief Justice of India of India".

These are noted as printed; none is corrected here.

An example

Narmada Engineering and Doab Castings have a clause for three arbitrators and no appointment procedure. Narmada appoints its arbitrator and sends Doab a written request to appoint one. Doab does nothing. Once thirty days from Doab's receipt of the request have passed, section 11(4)(a) lets Narmada request the High Court named by section 11(12)(b), or its designate, to make the appointment. Under section 11(6A) the examination is confined to the existence of the arbitration agreement.

Common mistakes

  • Counting the thirty days from the date the request was sent, when section 11(4)(a) and (5) count from receipt. Section 3 says when a written communication is deemed received.
  • Skipping a fall-back step in the agreed procedure before making a request under sub-section (6).
  • Proposing an arbitrator who falls within the Seventh Schedule, which section 12(5) makes a ground of ineligibility.

Need help with an appointment?

A request under section 11 turns on dates and on the arbitration agreement itself. Our legal dispute resolution service prepares the request to appoint, tracks the thirty-day period and, where needed, the application under section 11.

Key takeaways

  • Parties may agree the appointment procedure (section 11(2)); section 11(3) supplies the default for three arbitrators.
  • Thirty days is the period in section 11(4) and (5); section 11(6) prints none.
  • The request goes to the Supreme Court in an international commercial arbitration and to the High Court in any other arbitration (section 11(12)), or to their designate.
  • The examination is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement (section 11(6A)).
  • The decision is final (section 11(7)); sixty days is an endeavour, as printed (section 11(13)).

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the India Code consolidated text of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whose footnotes show amendments up to Act 3 of 2021 and a latest date of 12 October 2023, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Rules, regulations and notifications under the Act, later amendments and the commencement of the Mediation Act, 2023 should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 11

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Who appoints the arbitrator if the other party does not?

On a request by a party, the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court (section 11(4), (5)).

How long must I wait before making the request?

Thirty days from the other party's receipt of the request to appoint, or to agree on a sole arbitrator; and thirty days from the date of their appointment where the two arbitrators cannot agree on the third.

Keep the correspondence; the story of a dispute is told in its emails.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Section 11: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 7 questions readers ask most on this topic.

On a request by a party, the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court (section 11(4), (5)).

Thirty days from the other party's receipt of the request to appoint, or to agree on a sole arbitrator; and thirty days from the date of their appointment where the two arbitrators cannot agree on the third.

Section 11(12)(b) points to the High Court within whose local limits the principal Civil Court referred to in section 2(1)(e) is situate, or that High Court itself where it is the Court under that clause.

Section 11(7) says the decision is final and no appeal including Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against it.

The sub-section says the application shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to dispose of it within sixty days from service of notice on the opposite party. It prints no consequence for a longer time.

Yes, unless the parties have agreed otherwise (section 11(1)).

Section 15(2) says a substitute is appointed according to the rules that applied to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced.