Next due
20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 4 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 5 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 14 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 22 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 26 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 30 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 36 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 44 days
All due dates

Sections 87-88 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Material Alteration of a Negotiable Instrument

Any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders it void as against anyone who is a party at the time of the alteration and does not consent, unless the alteration was...

Published
Updated
Reading time
8 min
Views
17
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Negotiable Instruments Act
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
8 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 87 says what a material alteration does: it makes the instrument void against anyone who was a party at the time of the alteration and did not consent, unless it was made to carry out the common intention of the original parties. Section 88 says an acceptor or indorser stays bound by his acceptance or indorsement despite a previous alteration. This article reads both as per the consolidated text consulted.

Section 87: the general rule

Section 87 reads: "Any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the same void as against any one who is a party thereto at the time of making such alteration and does not consent thereto, unless it was made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties".

The conditions can be set out in order:

  1. There is a material alteration of the instrument.
  2. The person sought to be charged was a party at the time of making the alteration.
  3. He did not consent to the alteration.
  4. The alteration was not made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties.

If all four are present, the instrument is void as against him. The section does not define "material alteration" and gives no list, so this article does not supply examples of what counts as material beyond ordinary sense. An overwritten amount on a cheque is the plain example. If you have received a notice relying on a changed instrument, or you are accused of changing one, a reply to the legal notice prepared on the right facts is often the first step.

Who is protected

Only a person who was a party at the time of the alteration and did not consent. A person who became a party after the alteration is not within the words of the first limb of the section. For him, section 88 and the other rules about indorsers and acceptors matter.

The exception: common intention of the original parties

An alteration "made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties" does not void the instrument under this section. The idea is that if the parties had all meant the instrument to say something and it was changed to say it, the change does not harm anyone. The text does not give an example and none is invented here. For the related rule on an instrument signed in blank or incomplete, see section 20 explained in inchoate stamped instruments and blank signed paper.

Alteration by an indorsee

The text continues, under the marginal heading "Alteration by indorsee": "And any such alteration, if made by an indorsee, discharges his indorser from all liability to him in respect of the consideration thereof."

So where the indorsee himself makes the alteration, his indorser is discharged from all liability to him "in respect of the consideration thereof". The Act spells the word "indorse"; "endorse" is the common spelling in business use. The consequence falls on the indorsee: he loses recourse against his own indorser for the consideration.

The "subject to" sentence

Section 87 ends: "The provisions of this section are subject to those of sections 20, 49, 86 and 125." Four cross-references are named:

SectionWhere it is explained
20Inchoate stamped instruments and blank signed paper; see the article on section 20
49Converting a blank indorsement into one in full; see converting a blank indorsement and the effect of indorsement
86Qualified or limited acceptance; see qualified or limited acceptance of a bill
125In the text consulted, section 125 sits in the part on crossed cheques; this article does not explain it

Section 49 allows a holder to write a direction above an indorser's signature, section 86 deals with the acceptance of a bill in qualified terms, and section 20 deals with instruments signed in blank. Section 87 gives way to each of them where they apply. We quote the cross-references as printed and do not go beyond what the words say.

Section 88: acceptor or indorser bound despite previous alteration

Section 88 states: "An acceptor or indorser of a negotiable instrument is bound by his acceptance or indorsement notwithstanding any previous alteration of the instrument."

  • Who is covered: an acceptor or indorser.
  • What binds him: his own acceptance or indorsement.
  • Despite what: "any previous alteration".

The point is the timing. Section 87 protects a party who was in place when the alteration was made and did not consent. Section 88 deals with a person who accepts or indorses after an alteration. By accepting or indorsing, he is bound on his own act, even though the instrument had earlier been altered.

PersonPosition
Party at the time of a material alteration who did not consent (and no common-intention exception)Instrument is void as against him (section 87)
Indorsee who makes the alterationHis indorser is discharged from liability to him in respect of the consideration (section 87)
Acceptor or indorser who signs after an earlier alterationBound by his acceptance or indorsement (section 88)

The text of section 88 does not say what he knew about the alteration. It does not make his liability depend on knowledge, and this article does not add that.

Example 1. Jain Brothers sign a promissory note for a stated amount in favour of Kohli & Co. Without telling Jain Brothers, Kohli & Co. changes the amount to a higher figure. The change is not to carry out any common intention of the original parties. Jain Brothers were a party at the time and did not consent. Under section 87 the note is void as against Jain Brothers.

Example 2. A bill is altered by an unknown person after it is drawn. Later, Lakhani Traders accepts it, and Mehra Agency indorses it. Under section 88, Lakhani Traders is bound by its acceptance and Mehra Agency by its indorsement, notwithstanding the previous alteration.

Example 3. Nanda Pharma, as indorsee, itself changes the amount on an instrument indorsed to it by Oberoi Wholesale. Under section 87, Oberoi Wholesale, its indorser, is discharged from all liability to Nanda Pharma in respect of the consideration.

Practical points

  • Inspect an instrument before you sign or accept. Look for changes in ink, amounts or dates. Under section 88, signing after an alteration binds you to your own act.
  • Do not alter an instrument without the written consent of every party. If you are an indorsee, an alteration by you can cost you your recourse against your indorser.
  • If you must correct a mistake, record everyone's consent. The exception turns on the common intention of the original parties.
  • For truncated cheques, the Act has a separate rule on differences between the image and the original; see payment of altered instrument and bill held by acceptor.

Need help responding to an allegation of alteration?

If a notice says you are liable on an instrument that you say was altered, or you are accused of altering one, our reply to the legal notice service can help you set out the facts against sections 87 and 88. Bring the notice, the instrument and any copies from before the alleged change.

Key takeaways

  • Section 87: a material alteration voids the instrument as against a party at the time who did not consent, unless made to carry out the common intention of the original parties.
  • An indorsee who makes the alteration discharges his indorser from liability to him in respect of the consideration.
  • Section 87 is subject to sections 20, 49, 86 and 125.
  • Section 88: an acceptor or indorser is bound by his acceptance or indorsement notwithstanding any previous alteration.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on a consolidated text of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stating the position as of 26 December 2015 and on the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Later amendments and current criminal procedure law should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 87-88

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What does a material alteration do under section 87?

It renders the instrument void as against anyone who was a party at the time and did not consent, unless it was made to carry out the common intention of the original parties.

What is a material alteration?

The section does not define it. This article does not supply a definition.

Read the clause that says what happens when things go wrong; it is the one you will use.

— TaxClue Legal Desk

Sections 87-88: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

It renders the instrument void as against anyone who was a party at the time and did not consent, unless it was made to carry out the common intention of the original parties.

The section does not define it. This article does not supply a definition.

His indorser is discharged from all liability to him in respect of the consideration.

Yes. Section 88 says an acceptor or indorser is bound by his acceptance or indorsement notwithstanding any previous alteration.

Sections 20, 49, 86 and 125, as printed.

The text does not say so.