Next due
15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026due today 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 5 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 6 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 15 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 23 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 27 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 37 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 45 days
All due dates

Section 66(3) to (10) of the Competition Act, 2002: transfer of pending MRTP cases and investigations

Monopolistic and restrictive trade practice cases pending before the old Commission stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and are decided under the repealed Act. Unfair...

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min
Views
8
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
  • In-Depth Guide
Topic
Competition Law
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
9 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 66(3) to (10) of the Competition Act, 2002 says where cases and investigations pending under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 went when that Act was repealed. Restrictive and monopolistic trade practice cases go to the Appellate Tribunal; most unfair trade practice cases go to the National Commission; investigations go to the Competition Commission of India or the National Commission; and everything else abates. The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 does not touch these sub-sections.

How this article reads the Act

This article follows the consolidated text of the Act published by the Competition Commission of India (amendments shown up to the Finance Act, 2017), read with the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 as published in the Gazette of India on 11 April 2023. The 2023 Act does not touch Section 66, so the text below is as printed. The Section 66 text carries heavy footnotes; we explain what is printed and do not re-trace each earlier version. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the General Clauses Act, 1897 are named as printed; check the current law for the corresponding provisions. The dates mentioned in the text, such as the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009 and the assent to the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2009, are not given as calendar dates in the printed text, and we give none. If you are researching an older matter, our legal dispute resolution team can help you trace its present position.

Section 66(3): monopolistic and restrictive trade practice cases

"All cases pertaining to monopolistic trade practices or restrictive trade practices pending (including such cases, in which any unfair trade practice has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, on the commencement of the competition Amendment Act, 2009 stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the provisions of the repealed Act as if that Act had not been repealed."

The printed text reads "the competition Amendment Act,.2009", with a stray full stop, and the footnote marks sit inside the sentence; these are printing slips, flagged and not corrected. The key point is that the cases keep the law under which they were filed: the Appellate Tribunal decides them "in accordance with the provisions of the repealed Act".

Explanation. "For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that all cases referred to in this sub-section, sub-section (4) and sub-section (5) shall be deemed to include all applications made for the losses or damages under section 12(B) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 as it stood before its repeal". Applications for loss or damage under that section are therefore covered with the cases.

Section 66(4): unfair trade practice cases

"Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), all cases pertaining to unfair trade practices other than those referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 and pending before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission immediately before the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009 shall, on such commencement, stand transferred to the National Commission constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the National Commission shall dispose of such cases as if they were cases filed under that Act."

The printed text shows the opening words of this passage inside quotation marks, the result of a substitution. There are two provisos. First, the National Commission may, if it considers appropriate, transfer any case transferred to it to the concerned State Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which disposes of it as if filed under that Act. Second, all cases relating to unfair trade practices pending before the National Commission under this sub-section on or before the date on which the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2009 receives the assent of the President shall, from that date, stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and be adjudicated by it under the repealed Act as if that Act had not been repealed.

Section 66(5): clause (x) unfair trade practice cases

"All cases pertaining to unfair trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 and pending before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009 stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall dispose of such cases as if they were cases filed under that Act."

Section 66(6): investigations other than unfair trade practice ones

"All investigations or proceedings, other than those relating to unfair trade practices, pending before the Director General of Investigation and Registration on or before the commencement of this Act shall, on such commencement, stand transferred to the Competition Commission of India, and the Competition Commission of India may conduct or order for conduct of such investigation or proceedings in the manner as it deems fit."

Section 66(7): unfair trade practice investigations

All investigations or proceedings relating to unfair trade practices, other than those referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A, and pending before the Director General of Investigation and Registration on or before the commencement of this Act shall, on such commencement, stand transferred to the National Commission constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which may conduct or order for conduct of such investigation or proceedings as it deems fit. A proviso says that all such investigations or proceedings pending before the National Commission on or before the date on which the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2009 receives the assent of the President stand transferred, from that date, to the Appellate Tribunal, which may conduct or order the conduct of them as it deems fit.

Section 66(8): clause (x) investigations

All investigations or proceedings relating to unfair trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A, and pending before the Director General of Investigation and Registration on or before the commencement of the Act, stand transferred on such commencement to the Competition Commission of India, which may conduct or order for conduct of such investigation in the manner as it deems fit.

Section 66(9) and (10): abatement and the General Clauses Act

(9) "Save as otherwise provided under sub-sections (3) to (8), all cases or proceedings pending before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall abate."

(10) "The mention of the particular matters referred to in sub-sections (3) to (8) shall not be held to prejudice or affect the general application of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897) with regard to the effect of repeal."

Where each kind of matter went

Sub-sectionKind of matterWent to
66(3)Monopolistic and restrictive trade practice cases (including those with an unfair trade practice alleged)Appellate Tribunal, decided under the repealed Act
66(4)Other unfair trade practice casesNational Commission (and State Commission on transfer); later pending ones to the Appellate Tribunal
66(5)Clause (x) of section 36A unfair trade practice casesAppellate Tribunal
66(6)Investigations other than unfair trade practicesCompetition Commission of India
66(7)Unfair trade practice investigations (other than clause (x))National Commission; proviso to Appellate Tribunal
66(8)Clause (x) investigationsCompetition Commission of India
66(9)Anything else pendingAbates
66(10)Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897Not prejudiced

What the 2023 Amendment Act changed

Nothing in Section 66.

Practical example

A researcher finds a restrictive trade practice complaint from before the repeal. Under Section 66(3) it stands transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and is decided under the old Act. An unfair trade practice complaint of a different kind went first to the National Commission and, if it was still pending there on the relevant date, to the Appellate Tribunal under the proviso. A matter not covered by sub-sections (3) to (8) abated under sub-section (9). For the Tribunal's present role see Section 53A.

Need help tracing an older proceeding?

The route a pre-repeal case took depends on its kind, its stage and the dates in sub-sections (3) to (8). Our legal dispute resolution team can help establish which forum holds it and which law applies. For the repeal itself, see Sections 65 and 66(1) to (2).

Key takeaways

  • Monopolistic and restrictive trade practice cases went to the Appellate Tribunal and are decided under the repealed Act.
  • Unfair trade practice cases went mostly to the National Commission; clause (x) cases to the Appellate Tribunal.
  • Investigations went to the Competition Commission of India or, for unfair trade practices, the National Commission.
  • Everything else pending abated, with the General Clauses Act, 1897 unaffected.
  • The 2023 Act does not change these sub-sections.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the consolidated text of the Competition Act, 2002 published by the Competition Commission of India (amendments shown up to the Finance Act, 2017), read with the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 as published in the Gazette of India on 11 April 2023, and on the regulations and guidelines of the Commission as notified in 2024, as consulted on 2 October 2026. Commencement notifications, notified thresholds, rules and later amendments should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 66

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Where did pending restrictive trade practice cases go?

To the Appellate Tribunal, which adjudicates them in accordance with the repealed Act as if it had not been repealed (Section 66(3)).

What happened to unfair trade practice cases?

Those other than clause (x) of section 36A went to the National Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Section 66(4)); clause (x) cases went to the Appellate Tribunal (Section 66(5)).

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 66: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

To the Appellate Tribunal, which adjudicates them in accordance with the repealed Act as if it had not been repealed (Section 66(3)).

Those other than clause (x) of section 36A went to the National Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Section 66(4)); clause (x) cases went to the Appellate Tribunal (Section 66(5)).

No. Section 66(9) says that, save as provided in sub-sections (3) to (8), all cases or proceedings pending before the old Commission abate.

Investigations went to the Competition Commission of India or, for unfair trade practices, to the National Commission, as sub-sections (6) to (8) provide.

Section 66(10) preserves its general application on the effect of repeal.

No.