Next dueCompany / ROC
14 OCTADT-1 · Auditor appointment (after AGM)in 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days 31 OCTMSME-1 · Dues to MSMEs · Apr–Sep 2026in 29 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 58 days 30 JUNDPT-3 · Return of deposits · FY 2026-27in 271 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days
All due dates

Section 446B: Lesser Penalties for Small Companies and OPCs

Section 446B halves every penalty for four classes of company - but not fines, not imprisonment, and not MCA additional fees. Which provisions it touches, with worked...

Published
Updated
Reading time
4 min
Views
12
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Company Law
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Oct 2, 2026
Reading time
4 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 446B is a short provision with a large effect: for four classes of company, every penalty under the Companies Act is halved, subject to caps.

It's also misapplied constantly — because it covers penalties but not fines, and because the classes are defined narrowly.

The four eligible classes

ClassDefinition
One Person CompanyA company with only one person as a member
Small companyNon-public company, paid-up capital not exceeding ₹4 crore, previous-year turnover not exceeding ₹40 crore — excluding a holding company, a subsidiary, a Section 8 company, or one governed by a special Act
Start-up companyA private company recognised as such under the DPIIT notification
Producer CompanyAs defined in Chapter XXIA

Note what the start-up limb does. A DPIIT-recognised start-up gets the halved penalty even after it has outgrown small-company status — a funded company with paid-up capital above ₹4 crore still qualifies.

That's a distinct benefit and it's routinely overlooked, precisely at the growth stage where compliance is most likely to slip. Start-up relaxations →

Penalty, not fine

Section 446B applies where a penalty is payable. It does not apply where the provision prescribes a fine, imprisonment, or both.

ProvisionNature446B relief
Sec 92(5) — annual return not filedPenaltyYes
Sec 137(3) — financial statements not filedPenaltyYes
Sec 12(8) — registered office defaultPenaltyYes
Sec 450 — general penaltyPenaltyYes
Sec 90(11) — SBO register / returnPenaltyYes
Sec 172 — directors chapter defaultsPenaltyYes
Sec 42(10) — private placementPenaltyYes
Sec 185(4) — loan to directorFine and/or imprisonmentNo
Sec 186(13) — loans and investmentsFine and imprisonmentNo
Sec 76A — depositsFine and imprisonmentNo
Sec 118(12) — tampering with minutesImprisonment and fineNo
Sec 167(2) — acting after vacation of officeImprisonment or fine or bothNo
Sec 447 — fraudImprisonment and fineNo

The line isn't arbitrary. The provisions converted to penalties are the compliance-type defaults. Those retained as offences involve dishonesty, self-dealing or public money — and Parliament kept the criminal limb on exactly those.

Three worked examples

1 — Annual return filed 500 days late by a small company.

Section 92(5): ₹10,000 + ₹100/day, capped at ₹2,00,000 for the company and ₹50,000 for an officer.

  • Full penalty on the company: ₹10,000 + (500 × ₹100) = ₹60,000
  • 446B: half = ₹30,000
  • Full penalty on each officer: ₹60,000, capped at ₹50,000
  • 446B: half = ₹25,000 per officer

But note: the additional fee of 500 × ₹100 = ₹50,000 on the portal is not reduced. Section 446B applies to penalties, not fees. Additional fees →

2 — Section 450 general penalty, 100-day continuing default, small company.

  • Full: ₹10,000 + (100 × ₹1,000) = ₹1,10,000, within the ₹2,00,000 company cap
  • 446B: half = ₹55,000

3 — Section 185 contravention by a small company.

  • Section 185(4) prescribes a fine of ₹5,00,000–₹25,00,000 on the company, and imprisonment or fine on the officers.
  • 446B does not apply. No reduction at all.

How the caps interact

Section 446B has its own caps — ₹2,00,000 for a company, ₹1,00,000 for an officer or other person — which sit as an outer ceiling on the reduced penalty.

Where the underlying section's own cap is lower, that lower cap governs the computation before halving. Where the underlying section has no cap, Section 446B supplies one.

Proving you qualify

The company has to actually be in one of the four classes at the relevant time.

  • Small company — check paid-up capital and previous-year turnover against the audited financial statements, and confirm you're not a holding company, subsidiary, Section 8 company or governed by a special Act. Small company thresholds →
  • Start-up — produce the DPIIT recognition certificate, valid at the relevant date.
  • OPC — the single-member position is already on the record.

And claim it properly. A representation under Section 454 claiming 446B relief should attach the evidence — the audited financials or the DPIIT certificate — not merely assert the status. Adjudicating officers apply the relief when it's proved, not when it's mentioned.

Key takeaways

  • Half the penalty, capped at ₹2,00,000 / ₹1,00,000.
  • Four classes, and a start-up qualifies even after outgrowing small-company status.
  • Penalties only. Fines and imprisonment are untouched.
  • Additional fees are not reduced.
  • A subsidiary is never a small company — but could still be a recognised start-up.
  • Attach the evidence when you claim it.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 4 September 2026. Small company thresholds and DPIIT criteria are amended periodically. Take professional advice.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 446B

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does Section 446B halve every liability?

No — only penalties. Fine and imprisonment provisions are unaffected.

Does it apply to MCA additional fees?

No. Additional fee is a fee under the Rules, not a penalty under the Act.

A related-party transaction disclosed is a routine matter; one discovered is a problem.

— TaxClue Corporate Law Desk

Section 446B: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
10,247 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

No — only penalties. Fine and imprisonment provisions are unaffected.

No. Additional fee is a fee under the Rules, not a penalty under the Act.

Yes. Section 446B names start-up companies separately.

Not as a small company — a subsidiary is excluded from Section 2(85). But it could qualify as a DPIIT-recognised start-up.

It applies by operation of law, but claim it expressly, with evidence, in the reply to a Section 454 show-cause notice.