Next due
15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026tomorrow 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 6 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 7 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 16 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 24 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 28 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 38 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 46 days
All due dates

Section 15 of the Designs Act, 2000: Requirements Before Delivery on Sale

Before delivery on sale of articles with a registered design, the proprietor must (a) if exact representations or specimens were not furnished with the application, furnish the...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
14
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Design Registration
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 13, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Before a registered proprietor delivers articles for sale, section 15 asks for two things. If exact representations or specimens of the design were not furnished with the application, the proprietor must furnish them to the Controller. And each article must be marked with the prescribed mark or words or figures showing the design is registered. The consequences differ: failing the first can lead to the proprietor's name being erased from the register, and failing the second can cost the proprietor penalty or damages in an infringement action. If you are preparing to launch, our industrial design registration team can put this on your pre-sale checklist.

Sub-section (1)(a): exact representations or specimens

"Before delivery on sale of any articles to which a registered design has been applied, the proprietor shall- (a) (if exact representations or specimens were not finished on the application for registration) furnish to the Controller the prescribed number of exact representations or specimens of the design; and, if he fails to do so, the Controller may, after giving notice thereof to the proprietor, erase his name from the register and thereupon the copyright in the design shall cease."

(The text prints "finished" where "furnished" is evidently meant.)

Read it slowly.

  • Trigger: delivery on sale of articles to which the registered design has been applied. The duty arises before delivery, not before registration.
  • Condition: only if exact representations or specimens were not furnished with the application. If they were, the duty does not arise.
  • Duty: furnish "the prescribed number" to the Controller. The number is in the Rules.
  • Consequence: the Controller "may" after notice erase the proprietor's name from the register, and "thereupon the copyright in the design shall cease".

Two points matter. The loss is severe, the end of the copyright, but it is not automatic: the Controller must give notice and he "may" erase. The text does not give a time limit for compliance after notice and does not say whether the erasure can be undone.

Sub-section (1)(b): marking each article

"(b) causes each such article to be marked with the prescribed mark, or with the prescribed words or figures denoting that the design is registered; and, if he fails to do so, the proprietor shall not be entitled to recover any penalty or damages in respect of any infringement of his copyright in the design unless he shows that he took all proper steps to ensure the marking of the article, or unless he shows that the infringement took place after the person guilty thereof knew or had received notice of the existence of the copyright in the design."

ElementWhat the text says
Who marksThe proprietor "causes" each article to be marked
What mark"The prescribed mark, or ... the prescribed words or figures denoting that the design is registered"
Consequence of failureNo entitlement to recover "any penalty or damages" for infringement
Escape 1The proprietor shows he "took all proper steps to ensure the marking"
Escape 2The proprietor shows the infringement took place after the infringer "knew or had received notice" of the copyright

Observe how the consequence is framed. Unlike clause (a), failure to mark does not end the copyright. It limits the remedy: no penalty or damages, unless one of the two escapes is shown. The text is silent on whether an injunction is affected; it speaks only of "penalty or damages". Our article on section 22 covers the sum recoverable and the suit for damages.

The prescribed mark, words and figures are in the Designs Rules, 2001. Our sibling article on rule 26 covers them; we do not quote the wording here.

Sub-section (2): dispensing with marking

"Where a representation is made to the Central Government by or on behalf of any trade or industry that in the interest of the trade or industry it is expedient to dispense with or modify as regards any class or description of articles any of the requirements of this section as to marking, the Central Government may, if it thinks fit, by rule under this Act, dispense with or modify such requirements as regards any such class or description of articles to such extent and subject to such conditions as it thinks fit."

Four points.

  1. A representation is made to the Central Government by or on behalf of a trade or industry, not by one proprietor.
  2. The ground is that it is "expedient" in the interest of the trade or industry.
  3. The power covers "any of the requirements of this section as to marking", that is, clause (b), not the furnishing of representations in clause (a).
  4. The Central Government may act only "by rule" and "if it thinks fit", to such extent and subject to such conditions as it thinks fit.

Keep batch records showing marking was done, so that you can show you "took all proper steps", and note that the second escape in clause (b) turns on notice to the infringer.

Illustration (invented)

Meadow Home Pvt. Ltd. registers a design for a ribbed ceramic soap dish, filing the application with drawings only. Before the first shipment, Meadow furnishes the prescribed number of specimens to the Controller, which satisfies clause (a). But the production line forgets to mould the prescribed words on the dishes. Six months later, a copier starts selling look-alike dishes. Meadow sues for damages. Under clause (b), Meadow cannot recover penalty or damages unless it shows it took all proper steps to ensure marking, or that the copier acted after knowing of or receiving notice of the copyright. Meadow had sent a letter to the copier before the copying began, so it can rely on the second escape for the period after the letter.

Need help preparing a design for market?

Section 15 can cost you your remedies if the paperwork is missed. Our industrial design registration experts can set up the specimen filing and a marking checklist before your first dispatch.

Key takeaways

  • Section 15 applies before delivery on sale of articles to which a registered design has been applied.
  • If exact representations or specimens were not furnished with the application, furnish the prescribed number to the Controller; failure can lead to erasure of the name from the register and the copyright ceasing.
  • Each article must be marked with the prescribed mark or words; failure bars recovery of penalty or damages unless the proprietor shows he took all proper steps or the infringer had notice.
  • The Central Government may, by rule, dispense with or modify the marking requirement for a class or description of articles on a trade or industry representation.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Designs Act, 2000 as enacted, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the Designs Rules, 2001 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 15

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Must I mark every article?

Clause (b) says the proprietor "causes each such article to be marked" with the prescribed mark, words or figures.

What if I forget to mark?

You cannot recover penalty or damages for infringement unless you show you took all proper steps to ensure marking, or the infringement occurred after the infringer knew or had notice of the copyright.

If a rule seems to have changed, check the date of what you are reading before you act on it.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Section 15: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Clause (b) says the proprietor "causes each such article to be marked" with the prescribed mark, words or figures.

You cannot recover penalty or damages for infringement unless you show you took all proper steps to ensure marking, or the infringement occurred after the infringer knew or had notice of the copyright.

The text says the Controller may, after notice, erase your name from the register and the copyright ceases; it does not use the word cancellation.

The Designs Rules, 2001; the Act says "prescribed".

Yes, under sub-section (2), by rule, after a representation by or on behalf of the trade or industry.

The text speaks only of "penalty or damages"; it is silent on injunctions.