Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 6 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 10 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 14 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 19 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 29 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 30 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 59 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 75 days
All due dates

Sections 85–87 of the Code on Social Security, 2020: Contracting, Remedies Against Third Parties and Insolvency

If an employer contracts out work ordinarily part of his trade or business, he is liable to pay compensation to the contractor's employee as if the employee were his own...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
9
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 85 makes a principal employer liable for compensation to a contractor's workers, with a right of indemnity. Section 86 lets an employer who has paid compensation recover from a stranger who is legally liable for damages. Section 87 protects the employee when the employer is insolvent and has insured the liability.

Why it matters

Principal employers often assume accidents among a contractor's staff are the contractor's problem. Section 85 says otherwise, and the contract needs an indemnity and insurance clause that reflects it. Drafting and reviewing such terms is a matter for legal consultation. See also our post on contract labour under the new Labour Codes and on tracking contractors' EPF compliance, which covers a similar principal-employer exposure.

Section 85: the principal employer and the contractor

Sub-sectionRule
(1)Where an employer, in the course of or for the purposes of his trade or business, contracts with a contractor for execution of the whole or any part of work which is ordinarily part of his trade or business, he is liable to pay to any employee employed in the work any compensation he would have been liable to pay had that employee been immediately employed by him; compensation is calculated by reference to the employee's wages under the employer who immediately employs him
(2)The employer is entitled to be indemnified by the contractor, or any other person from whom the employee could have recovered; a contractor who is himself an employer and liable is entitled to be indemnified by any sub-contractor in the same way. Disputes on indemnity in default of agreement are settled by the competent authority
(3)The employee may still recover from the contractor instead of the employer
(4)Section 85 does not apply if the accident occurred elsewhere than on, in or about the premises where the employer has undertaken or usually undertakes to execute the work, or which are otherwise under his control or management

Three points stand out. The test is whether the work is "ordinarily part of the trade or business", not whether the contractor is independent. The wages used are those the contractor pays, which matters for the section 78 calculation in sections 77 and 78. And the premises limit in (4) can defeat a claim against the principal for an accident elsewhere.

Section 86: remedy against a stranger

Where an employee has recovered compensation for an injury caused in circumstances creating a legal liability of some person other than the one who paid compensation to pay damages, then the person who paid and any person called on to pay indemnity under section 85 are entitled to be indemnified by the person liable for damages. A road accident caused by a third party's negligence is the typical case. The text does not set a procedure or time limit for this indemnity; it states the right. It must be read with section 74(7), which bars the employee from both suing for damages and claiming compensation.

Section 87: insolvency of the employer

When it applies

An employer has a contract with insurers for liability under the Chapter, and then becomes insolvent, makes a composition or scheme of arrangement with creditors, or, as a company, commences winding up.

What happens

Sub-sectionEffect
(1)The employer's rights against the insurers for that liability vest in the employee, notwithstanding insolvency or winding-up laws; the insurers have the same rights and liabilities as if they were the employer, but no greater liability
(2)If the insurers' liability is less than the employer's, the burden of proof for the balance in the insolvency or liquidation lies on the employee
(3)If the insurance contract is void or voidable for non-compliance with terms (other than premium payment), sub-section (1) applies as if it were not, and the insurers may prove in the insolvency for the amount paid; this does not apply if the employee fails to give notice to the insurers as soon as practicable after learning of the insolvency or liquidation proceedings
(4)Compensation liability accrued before adjudication or winding-up is deemed a priority debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the Companies Act, 2013
(5)A half-monthly payment is taken, for this purpose, as the lump sum it could be redeemed for under section 80; the authority's certificate of that sum is conclusive
(6)(4) applies to amounts an insurer proves under (3), but otherwise not where an insurance contract of this kind exists
(7)Section 87 does not apply where a company is wound up voluntarily merely for reconstruction or amalgamation

The priority in (4) is worth underlining for lenders and resolution professionals: the text puts compensation accrued before the date of the order or winding-up among the debts paid in priority. For the wider insolvency picture, our posts on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code are a separate subject.

A worked example

A construction company (the principal) awards a contractor the work of fabricating steel frames that form part of its business. A contractor's welder is injured on the company's site. Under s.85(1) the company is liable to pay compensation as if he were its own employee, based on the wages the contractor pays him. The welder may also claim directly from the contractor. After paying, the company claims indemnity from the contractor under s.85(2). If the injury was caused by a crane operator of a third-party firm, both the company and the contractor can seek indemnity from that firm under s.86. If the contractor's insurer and the contractor itself then face insolvency, the contractor's rights against its insurer vest in the welder under s.87(1). (Illustrative.)

Which rules apply

The Central Rules do not add a separate rule for these three sections in the parts we read; general competent authority procedure applies. The Central Rules apply where the Central Government is the appropriate Government; where the State Government is, the State's own rules apply.

Need help drafting contractor and insurance terms?

Indemnity clauses, insurance conditions and the premises test in section 85(4) all affect who pays after an accident. If you would like contracts or claims reviewed, our legal consultation team can help.

Key takeaways

  • A principal employer is liable for compensation to a contractor's workers doing work ordinarily part of his business, on the contractor's wage basis.
  • The principal can claim indemnity from the contractor; the worker may claim from the contractor instead.
  • Section 85 does not apply if the accident occurs away from the premises where the work is done or which he controls.
  • Anyone who has paid may recover from a third party liable in damages (s.86).
  • On insolvency, the employer's rights against the insurer vest in the employee; compensation has priority among debts.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Code on Social Security, 2020 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Code on Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 344(E), 8 May 2026), as on 30 September 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; some provisions may be notified later, and State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 85

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Is the principal employer liable for a contractor's employee?

Yes, if the work is ordinarily part of his trade or business, as if the employee were his own (s.85(1)).

Can the worker claim from the contractor?

Yes. Section 85(3) says the worker may recover from the contractor instead of the employer.

Sections 85: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
9,274 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Yes, if the work is ordinarily part of his trade or business, as if the employee were his own (s.85(1)).

Yes. Section 85(3) says the worker may recover from the contractor instead of the employer.

The competent authority, in default of agreement (s.85(2)).

Yes. Section 86 entitles the payer to be indemnified by a person legally liable to pay damages for the injury.

His rights against the insurers vest in the employee (s.87(1)), and compensation accrued before adjudication or winding-up ranks as a priority debt (s.87(4)).

No. Section 87(7) excludes winding-up merely for reconstruction or amalgamation.