Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 13 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 18 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 58 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 74 days
All due dates

Sections 61–62 of the Code on Wages, 2019: Inconsistent Laws and Agreements and Delegation of Powers

The Code "shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in the terms of any award, agreement...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
3
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 61 gives the Code on Wages, 2019 an overriding effect: it prevails over any inconsistent provision in another law, and over the terms of any award, agreement, settlement or contract of service. Section 62 lets the appropriate Government delegate its powers under the Code by notification. If your employment terms or sector rules conflict with the Code, a legal consultation can sort out which prevails.

Section 61: the overriding clause

The text: "The provisions of this Code shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in the terms of any award, agreement, settlement or contract of service."

What is overridden

Source of the inconsistent termEffect
Any other law for the time being in forceThe Code prevails to the extent of inconsistency
An awardSame
An agreementSame
A settlementSame
A contract of serviceSame

Three points of reading:

  1. Only inconsistent terms are displaced. The words are "anything inconsistent therewith". A term that is consistent with the Code, or that gives the employee more than the Code requires, is not caught by the words of section 61 as such. Note that section 60 separately voids terms that waive the amounts due; see sections 59 and 60.
  2. Other laws are not wiped out. Only inconsistency matters. Many laws can apply to the same workplace, such as the other Labour Codes and sector laws. The text does not say how the Code ranks against a later law, and it does not name particular laws. Section 66 saves two specific enactments; see sections 65 and 66.
  3. Settlements and awards do not lock in lower rates. A wage settlement signed years ago cannot be used to pay less than the Code requires where the two are inconsistent.

Hypothetical example. A factory has an old settlement under which a weekly-paid group of workers receives wages on the 15th of the following month. The Code's wage-payment time limits, covered in section 17, apply to the employer. To the extent the settlement allows payment later than the Code does, section 61 gives the Code effect over the settlement. The settlement terms are invented to show the point.

Practical checks for employers

  • List each appointment-letter clause, company policy, settlement and State rule that touches pay, deductions, bonus or records.
  • Mark each clause as consistent, more beneficial or inconsistent with the Code.
  • Revise the inconsistent ones; do not wait for a claim.
  • Take care with the repealed Acts. Section 69 repeals four Acts and saves actions taken under them to the extent they are not contrary to the Code; see our article on commencement and repeal.

Section 62: delegation of powers

"The appropriate Government may, by notification, direct that any power exercisable by it under this Code shall, in relation to such matters and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the notification, be also exercisable":

Where the appropriate Government is...The power may be exercised also by...
(a) The Central GovernmentSuch officer or authority subordinate to the Central Government, or by the State Government, or by such officer or authority subordinate to the State Government, as specified in the notification
(b) A State GovernmentSuch officer or authority subordinate to the State Government, as specified in the notification

Notes:

  • The word is "also exercisable": the delegating Government keeps the power.
  • Delegation is by notification, for specified matters and on specified conditions, if any.
  • A State Government cannot delegate to the Central Government or its officers. The Central Government can delegate to a State Government.
  • The section applies to "any power exercisable by it under this Code". It does not carve out the rule-making power in section 67, so whether rule-making can be delegated is a question the text leaves open; the rule-making power is expressed to be exercised "subject to the condition of previous publication" in section 67.

Who is the appropriate Government is defined in section 2(d); see our article on the definitions. In practice, a notification under section 62 tells you who now exercises, for example, the powers to fix minimum wages, appoint authorities or specify compounding officers. Check the notifications of the appropriate Government.

What the Central Rules add

The Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 343(E), 8 May 2026) apply only where the Central Government is the appropriate Government. Where the State Government is the appropriate Government, the State's own wage rules apply. In the Rules text read for this article, no rule adds to sections 61 or 62. The Rules do refer to authorities that the Central Government notifies, such as the claims authority in rule 49 and the officers in rules 53 and 54, and those are examples of where delegation notifications matter. See the rules on claims.

Need help reconciling contracts and policies with the Code?

Legacy settlements, standing orders and appointment letters often carry terms that no longer fit. Our legal consultation team can review them against the Code, identify inconsistent terms and advise on revisions and notification-based delegation questions.

Key takeaways

  • The Code prevails over inconsistent provisions of other laws and over inconsistent awards, agreements, settlements and contracts of service (s.61).
  • Only inconsistent terms are displaced; more beneficial terms are outside the words of the section.
  • Section 62 lets the appropriate Government delegate powers by notification; the Central Government can delegate to States, but a State can delegate only within its own officers.
  • Delegation is "also" exercisable: the Government keeps its power.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Code on Wages, 2019 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 343(E), 8 May 2026), as on 1 October 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government, and wage rates are notified separately. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 61

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does the Code override an old wage settlement?

To the extent the settlement is inconsistent with the Code, yes (s.61).

Does it override other laws?

Section 61 says "notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law". Section 66 separately saves two Acts.

Sections 61: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
9,274 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

To the extent the settlement is inconsistent with the Code, yes (s.61).

Section 61 says "notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law". Section 66 separately saves two Acts.

A term that is inconsistent with the Code is overridden; see also section 60 on waivers.

Officers or authorities specified in a notification under section 62.

Section 62(b) allows delegation only to officers or authorities subordinate to the State Government.

Yes. Check which officer or authority is notified for the power concerned, for example claims or compounding.