Next dueLLP
30 OCTLLP Form 8 · Accounts & solvency · FY 2025-26in 28 days 30 MAYLLP Form 11 · Annual return · FY 2026-27in 240 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 13 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 18 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days
All due dates

Section 28 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008: Extent of Liability of a Partner

A partner is not personally liable, directly or indirectly, for an LLP obligation referred to in s.27(3) solely by reason of being a partner (s.28(1)). This does not affect his...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
0
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Low Complexity
Topic
LLP & Partnership
Published
October 1, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 28 is the provision that gives an LLP partner his limited liability. A partner is not personally liable for the LLP's obligations merely because he is a partner, and he is not liable for another partner's wrongful act or omission. He remains answerable for his own wrongful act or omission. If your concern is a specific claim against you as a partner, our legal consultation service can help you look at it against the text and your LLP agreement.

Section 28(1): being a partner is not enough

Section 27(3) says an obligation of the LLP, in contract or otherwise, is solely the obligation of the LLP. Section 28(1) completes the point from the partner's side: a partner is not personally liable, "directly or indirectly", for such an obligation "solely by reason of being a partner".

Three words in this sub-section carry weight.

  • "Directly or indirectly" means the protection is not limited to a direct claim. A creditor cannot reach a partner by an indirect route if the only link between them is that he is a partner.
  • "Solely" means the protection is for liability that rests only on partnership status. If the partner is liable for some other reason, for example because he signed a personal guarantee, the liability rests on that reason and not on partnership.
  • "Obligation referred to in sub-section (3) of Section 27" ties the protection to the LLP's own obligations in contract or otherwise. See our article on sections 26 and 27.

The Act text does not use the words "personal guarantee". A guarantee is a separate contract with a lender; whether a partner is bound by one depends on that contract and not on section 28. Treat that as a practical point to check, not as a statement in the section.

Example. Nikhil Rao and Kavita Shah are partners in Rao Shah Analytics LLP. The LLP buys equipment on credit and cannot pay. The supplier's claim is an obligation of the LLP. By s.28(1), neither Nikhil nor Kavita is personally liable for it solely because he or she is a partner. The supplier looks to the LLP's property (s.27(4)).

Section 28(2): own wrong versus another's wrong

The sub-section says two things in one sentence.

  1. Section 27(3) and section 28(1) do not affect the personal liability of a partner for his own wrongful act or omission.
  2. A partner shall not be personally liable for the wrongful act or omission of any other partner of the LLP.
Whose act?Is the partner personally liable?Source
The LLP's obligation (contract or otherwise)Not solely because he is a partner28(1)
The partner's own wrongful act or omissionYes, his personal liability is not affected28(2)
Another partner's wrongful act or omissionNo, not personally28(2)

Example, continued. Kavita, advising a customer on the LLP's behalf, gives careless advice that causes a loss. The customer may claim against Kavita for her own wrongful act. By s.27(2) the LLP is also liable, as the wrong was in the course of its business. Nikhil is not personally liable for Kavita's act. The Act does not say how the loss is shared between the LLP and Kavita; that depends on the LLP agreement and other law.

Where the protection ends

Section 28 is not an absolute shield.

  • Fraud. Section 30 makes the liability of the LLP and of the partners who acted with intent to defraud unlimited for the LLP's debts and liabilities. See section 30.
  • Holding out. A person who represents himself, or knowingly lets himself be represented, as a partner can be liable to someone who gave credit on that faith. See section 29.
  • His own contractual undertakings. The protection is for liability arising "solely by reason of being a partner". It does not cover a separate promise the partner has made in his own name; the text does not extend the protection to that.
  • Statutory duties of designated partners. The Act makes designated partners responsible for certain compliances and penalties. See sections 8–9. Those provisions impose duties of their own, apart from the debts of the LLP.

Contribution is a separate matter

A partner's obligation to contribute money, property or services is set by the LLP agreement (s.33(1)). That is an obligation he owes under the agreement, not a liability for the LLP's debts. The liability limit in s.28 does not wipe out his promised contribution. See sections 32–33.

Practical points

  • Keep a record of who did what. Section 28(2) separates one partner's acts from another's, so records matter if a dispute arises.
  • Do not sign personal guarantees for LLP loans without understanding that this is your own contract, outside s.28.
  • Do not allow loose use of the word "partner" for senior staff; see s.29.
  • If you suspect a co-partner of a wrong, keep copies of documents and take advice early.

Need help with a partner liability question?

Whether a claim sits with the LLP, with one partner for his own act, or with a person holding himself out as a partner is often a matter of reading the facts and the documents together. Our legal consultation team can review the agreement and the correspondence and explain your position in plain terms.

Key takeaways

  • A partner is not personally liable for the LLP's obligations solely because he is a partner (s.28(1)).
  • His personal liability for his own wrongful act or omission is not affected (s.28(2)).
  • He is not personally liable for another partner's wrongful act or omission (s.28(2)).
  • Fraud (s.30) and holding out (s.29) sit outside this protection.
  • A separate personal undertaking, such as a guarantee, is a matter of that contract.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 as amended by the Limited Liability Partnership (Amendment) Act, 2021, as consulted on 1 October 2026. Forms, fees and procedure are set by the LLP Rules, 2009 as amended from time to time. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Section 28

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Are LLP partners personally liable for the LLP's debts?

Not solely because they are partners. Section 28(1) says a partner is not personally liable, directly or indirectly, for an obligation of the LLP referred to in s.27(3) solely by reason of being a partner.

Is a partner liable for a co-partner's mistake?

Not personally. Section 28(2) says a partner shall not be personally liable for the wrongful act or omission of any other partner.

Section 28: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
9,274 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Not solely because they are partners. Section 28(1) says a partner is not personally liable, directly or indirectly, for an obligation of the LLP referred to in s.27(3) solely by reason of being a partner.

Not personally. Section 28(2) says a partner shall not be personally liable for the wrongful act or omission of any other partner.

Yes. Section 28(2) says the protection does not affect a partner's personal liability for his own wrongful act or omission.

No. Under section 30, where an act is done with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose, the liability of the LLP and of the partners who acted so is unlimited.

Section 28 speaks of liability arising solely by reason of being a partner. A guarantee is a separate undertaking, and the text of section 28 does not address it. Check the guarantee itself.

The text of section 28 does not release a contribution obligation. Section 33(1) says the obligation to contribute is as per the LLP agreement.