Next due
7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 13 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 18 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 28 days 31 OCTITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27in 29 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 58 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 74 days
All due dates

Sections 161–163 of the Code on Social Security, 2020: Overriding Effect, Delegation and Removal of Difficulties

The Code overrides inconsistent laws, awards, agreements and contracts of service, made before or after it (s.161(1)). But where a person is entitled to a more favourable benefit...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
1
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Labour Laws
Published
September 30, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 161 says the Code prevails over inconsistent laws, awards and contracts, but keeps any more favourable benefit a person already has. Section 162 lets the appropriate Government delegate its powers to social security bodies and officers. Section 163 lets the Central Government remove difficulties by order within a time limit.

Why it matters

For HR teams, s.161 answers a question that comes up whenever a contract, settlement or company policy gives more than the Code: the better term survives, matter by matter. It also means a contract cannot give less than the Code. For employers with legacy settlements or union agreements, reading s.161 carefully avoids both over-paying and under-paying. Our legal consultation service can help you compare your contracts and policies against the Code. See also section 164 on repeal and savings.

Section 161: overriding effect and more favourable terms

Overriding effect (s.161(1))

The provisions of the Code have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent in:

  • any other law for the time being in force; or
  • the terms of any award, agreement or contract of service,

whether made before or after the coming into force of the Code.

The proviso: more favourable benefits continue

Where under any such award, agreement, contract of service or otherwise, a person is entitled to benefits in respect of any matter that are more favourable than those under the Code, the person continues to be entitled to the more favourable benefits in respect of that matter, notwithstanding that he receives benefits in respect of other matters under the Code.

The comparison is matter by matter. A person does not have to choose between the contract and the Code as a whole. For example, a contract may give a longer maternity leave but nothing on gratuity; the employee keeps the contract's leave term and receives gratuity under the Code. (This reading follows the words "in respect of that matter".)

Agreements giving more (s.161(2))

Nothing in the Code precludes a person from entering into an agreement with his employer granting rights or privileges more favourable than those under the Code in respect of any matter.

SituationResult
Contract gives less than the CodeThe Code prevails (s.161(1))
Contract or award gives more in a matterThe better benefit continues for that matter (proviso)
Employer and employee agree to give more in futureAllowed (s.161(2))

Section 162: delegation of powers

The appropriate Government may, by notification, direct that all or any of its powers and functions may also be exercised by:

  • the Central Board;
  • the Corporation;
  • the National Social Security Board;
  • the State Unorganised Workers' Board;
  • the Building Workers' Welfare Board; or
  • any officer or authority subordinate to any of these bodies,

in relation to such matters and subject to such conditions, if any, as specified.

Two points: the delegation is by notification, and the power is also exercisable by the delegate, which means the Government itself does not lose it. The text does not say that the power to make rules can be delegated; it speaks of "powers and functions which may be exercised or performed by that Government".

Section 163: power to remove difficulties

163(1): if any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of the Code, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make provisions not inconsistent with the Code as necessary or expedient to remove the difficulty.

Proviso: no such order may be made after two years from the commencement of the Code.

163(2): every order must be laid, as soon as may be, before each House of Parliament.

Reading the two-year limit

The Code is in force from 21 November 2025, when the four Labour Codes were brought into force. The two-year period runs from "the commencement of this Code". Section 1(3) lets the Central Government appoint different dates for different provisions, so whether a particular provision's commencement changes the count is a question for the notification concerned. Check the notification, not just this summary.

What such an order cannot do

The order must be "not inconsistent with the provisions of this Code". It fills gaps in the working of the Code; it cannot override an express provision.

A worked example

An employee's appointment letter offers 30 days of paid leave on account of a miscarriage, which is more than the Code gives for that matter. Under the s.161 proviso she keeps the more favourable leave for that matter, while receiving gratuity and other benefits under the Code. Separately, a company's 2019 settlement says gratuity will be paid only after ten years of service; to the extent this gives less than the Code, the Code prevails under s.161(1). (Illustrative; the leave figure is hypothetical and not a Code figure.)

Need help reviewing contracts and policies?

A quick review can show where your appointment letters, settlements and HR policies already exceed the Code and where they fall short. Our legal consultation team can help you compare them matter by matter and suggest amendments.

Key takeaways

  • The Code overrides inconsistent laws, awards, agreements and contracts, made before or after it.
  • More favourable benefits continue in the matter concerned, matter by matter.
  • Parties may agree better terms than the Code (s.161(2)).
  • Powers may be delegated by notification to Boards, the Corporation and subordinate officers (s.162).
  • Removal-of-difficulty orders: Central Government only, within two years of commencement, laid before Parliament.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Code on Social Security, 2020 (as enacted) and, where noted, the Code on Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026 (G.S.R. 344(E), 8 May 2026), as on 30 September 2026. The Code is in force from 21 November 2025; some provisions may be notified later, and State Governments make their own rules for establishments where the State is the appropriate Government. Verify the current position before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 161

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Does the Code override my employment contract?

Yes, if the contract is inconsistent and gives less. Where the contract gives a more favourable benefit in a matter, that benefit continues.

Can I agree to give employees more than the Code?

Yes. Section 161(2) says the Code does not preclude such an agreement.

Sections 161: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
9,274 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Yes, if the contract is inconsistent and gives less. Where the contract gives a more favourable benefit in a matter, that benefit continues.

Yes. Section 161(2) says the Code does not preclude such an agreement.

The proviso speaks of benefits "in respect of that matter", so the comparison is matter by matter.

The Central Board, the Corporation, the National Social Security Board, the State Unorganised Workers' Board, the Building Workers' Welfare Board, or officers subordinate to them.

An order by the Central Government, published in the Gazette, that makes provisions not inconsistent with the Code to remove a difficulty in giving effect to it.

Not after two years from the commencement of the Code (s.163(1) proviso).