Ask Veda

TaxClue AI · Active
Namaste! I'm Veda — TaxClue's AI compliance assistant. 🙏

Ask me anything about GST, ITR, Company registration, Trademark, FSSAI or any compliance topic. When you're ready, I'll connect you with our expert for a callback.
Share your details — our expert will call you
Powered by TaxClue · India's Trusted Compliance Platform
GST LIVE

Rule 28 Valuation: The 90% Rule and the "Any Value" Proviso

Rule 28 sets out a careful four-step hierarchy for valuing supplies between branches — and then two provisos allow most FMCG companies to skip it entirely. The second proviso is...

Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert
8 min read 6 views Updated Sep 8, 2026 Expert Reviewed Medium Complexity In-Depth Guide
Rule 28 Valuation: The 90% Rule and the "Any Value" Proviso
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Verified against: Government sources
Quick Answer

Rule 28 sets out a careful four-step hierarchy for valuing supplies between branches — and then two provisos allow most FMCG companies to skip it entirely. The second proviso is the single most useful valuation provision in the sector, and it fails in exactly one situation.

Need help with GST?Talk to a qualified CA / CS about your exact case — no obligation.
Talk to an Expert →

Rule 28 sets out a careful four-step hierarchy for valuing supplies between branches — and then two provisos allow most FMCG companies to skip it entirely. The second proviso is the single most useful valuation provision in the sector, and it fails in exactly one situation.

The hierarchy, and what each step means

Step 1 — Open market value. The Explanation to rule 35 defines it as "the full value in money payable by an unrelated person where the supplier and recipient are not related and price is the sole consideration."

In FMCG, OMV is usually findable, from the price charged to "independent distributors, wholesalers, modern trade chains, e-commerce channels" or from "price lists applicable to unrelated buyers". The Guide's illustration: a Maharashtra factory transfers shampoo to a Delhi depot while selling the same shampoo to unrelated distributors at ₹100 per unit — OMV is ₹100.

Step 2 — Like kind and quality. Used for a newly launched product with no external sales yet: "the company may use the price of comparable cosmetic products having similar characteristics, quality, ingredients and market positioning."

Step 3 — Rule 30, the cost method. "Value = 110 per cent of cost of production / manufacture / acquisition." A toothpaste costing ₹50 to make is valued at ₹55.

Step 4 — Rule 31, residual. "reasonable means consistent with GST valuation principles", "generally used only in exceptional circumstances."

The first proviso: 90% of the onward price

Where goods are supplied to a distinct or related person, the recipient intends to further supply them "as such", and the recipient sells to an unrelated customer, the supplier may value the transfer at 90% of the recipient's onward price.

The Guide's illustration: a factory transfers toothpaste to a depot; the depot sells the same goods to a distributor at ₹100; the factory may value the transfer at ₹100 × 90% = ₹90.

When it is available:

  • the depot sells without further processing;
  • the goods are supplied "as such";
  • the subsequent sale is to an unrelated customer.

When it is not:

  • the goods are repacked;
  • the goods are relabelled;
  • the goods are manufactured further;
  • the goods are not sold "as such".

Relabelling is the one that catches FMCG companies out. A depot that applies a State-specific MRP sticker or a promotional flash has arguably not supplied the goods "as such", and the proviso becomes unavailable.

Note also that the proviso is optional"at the option of the supplier" — so it is a floor available to the taxpayer, not a valuation the department can insist upon.

The second proviso: whatever the invoice says

"where the recipient is eligible for full input tax credit, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be the open market value of the goods or services."

The Guide's illustration is deliberately extreme. A Delhi factory transfers goods to a Mumbai depot of the same PAN. Invoice value ₹50. OMV ₹100. The Mumbai depot is eligible for full ITC. "Hence, in terms of Second Proviso, ₹50 itself shall be deemed to be OMV. No requirement to adopt ₹100."

The logic is revenue neutrality. Whatever the transferor charges, the transferee credits — so the value chosen affects only the timing and the location of the credit, not the ultimate tax. The provision removes an argument that produces no revenue.

Which proviso to use, in the Guide's own matrix:

SituationPreferred rule
Recipient eligible for full ITCSecond Proviso — any value
Recipient sells goods as such90% rule may be adopted
Independent market price availableOMV
No OMV availableLike kind and quality
No comparable value availableRule 30 — 110% of cost
Exceptional situationsRule 31

The one situation where the second proviso breaks

"If the receiving branch or unit is not eligible for full ITC, the Second Proviso breaks down." The Guide names three cases:

  • the receiving unit engages in exempt supplies"certain unbranded or raw agricultural food products";
  • it is subject to common credit reversals under rule 42 or 43;
  • it uses the goods for blocked credit items under section 17(5)"e.g., promotional free sampling".

And then the whole hierarchy revives: "the company must strictly back up its valuation using actual OMV, goods of like kind and quality, or resort to the 110 per cent cost of production rule (Rule 30). Accurate cost-accounting data becomes highly critical here to survive Departmental audits."

The third case is the underappreciated one. A depot that receives stock partly for free-sample distribution has a section 17(5)(h) block on that portion, so it is not eligible for full ITC — and the branch that was comfortably invoicing at cost suddenly needs an OMV defence.

Read this alongside the rule 42 exposure it creates. A unit with any exempt turnover is doubly affected: it reverses common credit, and it loses the second proviso on everything transferred in.

Who is a "related person"

The Explanation to section 15 deems persons related where:

  • they are officers or directors of one another's businesses;
  • they are legally recognised partners;
  • they are employer and employee;
  • one directly or indirectly controls the other;
  • both are controlled by a third person;
  • together they directly or indirectly control another person;
  • they are members of the same family;
  • any person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds 25% or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of both of them.

In FMCG groups this reaches widely"supplies between parent companies, subsidiaries, group companies and controlled entities". Note the last limb in particular: a common 25% shareholder makes two otherwise unconnected companies related, and rule 28 then governs supplies between them.

What section 15 adds to the value regardless

Section 15(2) requires the value to include:

  • taxes, duties and fees under any law other than GST, if charged separately;
  • any amount the supplier is liable to pay but the recipient has incurred;
  • incidental expenses, including commission and packing charged by the supplier;
  • interest, late fees or penalties for delayed payment of consideration;
  • subsidies directly linked to the price, excluding Central and State Government subsidies.

The subsidy limb has a clean dividing line. Government subsidies are excluded even if price-linked; "subsidies from third parties (e.g., trade associations, private bodies) that are directly linked to price form part of the taxable value."

And the incidental-expenses limb catches recoveries FMCG companies bill separately"freight/transportation costs, special promotional repacking charges, or secondary handling fees" recovered from distributors are bundled into the taxable value. Freight and insurance as part of the supply →

Key takeaways

  • Rule 28 applies to supplies between distinct persons (s.25(4) and (5)) and related persons, other than through an agent.
  • The hierarchy is OMV → like kind and quality → rule 30 (110% of cost) → rule 31.
  • The first proviso permits 90% of the recipient's onward price, but only where goods are supplied "as such" — repacking or relabelling defeats it.
  • The second proviso deems the invoice value to be OMV wherever the recipient is eligible for full ITC.
  • The second proviso fails where the receiving unit makes exempt supplies, faces rule 42/43 reversal, or uses the goods for blocked credits such as free samples.
  • "Related person" under the Explanation to section 15 includes any pair with a common 25% shareholder.
  • Section 15(2) adds incidental expenses, non-GST taxes, delayed-payment interest and non-Government price-linked subsidies to the value.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on section 15 and section 25 of the CGST Act, 2017 and rules 27 to 35 of the CGST Rules, 2017, as reproduced in the ICAI GST Sectoral Guide on Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (July 2026, updated with Finance Act, 2026 amendments).

Key Facts About Rule 28 Valuation

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can a branch transfer be invoiced at cost?

Yes, where the receiving registration is eligible for full input tax credit. The second proviso to rule 28 deems the declared invoice value to be the open market value.

When can the 90% rule be used?

Where goods are supplied to a distinct or related person for further supply "as such" to an unrelated customer. It is unavailable if the goods are repacked, relabelled or processed further.

Over 90% of compliance penalties in India arise from missed due dates — timely handling can save businesses thousands of rupees each year.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Rule 28 Valuation: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Need Help with Compliance?

Our CA experts guide you through the entire process — registration to filing.

Frequently Asked Questions
Can a branch transfer be invoiced at cost?
Yes, where the receiving registration is eligible for full input tax credit. The second proviso to rule 28 deems the declared invoice value to be the open market value.
When can the 90% rule be used?
Where goods are supplied to a distinct or related person for further supply "as such" to an unrelated customer. It is unavailable if the goods are repacked, relabelled or processed further.
What if the receiving branch makes exempt supplies?
The second proviso no longer applies. Valuation must be supported by actual open market value, like kind and quality, or 110% of cost under rule 30.
What is open market value?
Per the Explanation to rule 35, the full value in money payable by an unrelated person where the parties are not related and price is the sole consideration.
Are two companies with a common shareholder related?
Yes, where any person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds 25% or more of the voting stock of both — Explanation to section 15.
Are separately billed freight charges outside the value?
No. Section 15(2)(c) includes incidental expenses, including packing and any amount charged for anything done in respect of the supply at or before delivery.
Let TaxClue handle your GSTFrom documentation to government filing — get it done right the first time.
Get Started →

Was this article helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!
Need help with GST?
  • GST Registration
  • GST Return Filing
  • GST Notice Reply
VS
Vikas Sharma VERIFIED EXPERT
7431 articles
Tax & Compliance Expert
Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

Related Guides

All guides →
Get Expert Help

Need help with your GST?

Our CA & CS professionals handle everything — from registration and filing to ongoing compliance. Talk to an expert about your exact case, no obligation.

4.9★ Google · CA & CS verified · ₹0 hidden charges · Confidential