Next dueGST
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 9 days 13 OCTGSTR-1 (QRMP) · Quarterly return · Jul–Sep 2026in 11 days 18 OCTCMP-08 · Composition payment · Jul–Sep 2026in 16 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 18 days 22 OCTGSTR-3B (QRMP) · Quarterly return · Jul–Sep 2026 · 22nd or 24th by statein 20 days 13 NOVIFF (QRMP) · B2B invoices · Oct 2026in 42 days 7 OCTTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Sep 2026in 5 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 13 days
All due dates
GST Live

Post-Supply Discounts: The New Section 15(3)(b) Test

Ask any distributor what their worst GST exposure is, and a surprising number will say year-end rebates. Not because the rebate is wrong, but because s.15(3)(b) demanded a piece...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Views
45
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GST
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Oct 1, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27Verified against: Government sources

Ask any distributor what their worst GST exposure is, and a surprising number will say year-end rebates. Not because the rebate is wrong, but because s.15(3)(b) demanded a piece of paperwork that commercial life rarely produces: a written agreement, signed at or before the supply, fixing a discount that only becomes calculable months later.

Section 153 of the Finance Act, 2026 substitutes the clause and removes that requirement.

The clause as it stood

Section 15(3) excludes two kinds of discount from value:

(a) a discount given before or at the time of supply, if duly recorded in the invoice; and

(b) a discount given after the supply has been effected, if — (i) "such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices"; and (ii) "input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient."

Limb (i) carried two conditions, and both broke on ordinary commerce:

  • Timing. A slab-based annual incentive is agreed in principle in April, but the entitlement crystallises only in March, once volumes are known. Departments read "established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply" strictly, and rejected discounts where the operative document post-dated the invoices.
  • Linkage. "Specifically linked to relevant invoices" is near-impossible where a rebate is computed on a year's aggregate turnover across thousands of invoices. Credit notes issued at a summary level failed the test.

The consequence of failing either limb was not that the credit note was invalid — it was that the discount could not be reduced from taxable value. The supplier had already passed on the money and was still liable for GST on the gross.

What the substituted clause says

"(b) after the supply has been effected, if for such discount, a credit note has been issued by the supplier and input tax credit as is attributable to such discount has been reversed by the recipient of the supply, in accordance with the provisions of section 34."

Two conditions, both mechanical:

  1. A credit note has been issued by the supplier, under s.34.
  2. The recipient has reversed the ITC attributable to that discount.

Nothing about when the discount was agreed. Nothing about invoice-level linkage.

Why section 34 had to be amended too

Section 34(1) lists when a credit note may be issued: the taxable value or tax in the invoice exceeds what is payable, the goods are returned, or the goods or services are found to be deficient.

A negotiated volume rebate is none of those. The invoice was correct when raised; nothing came back; nothing was deficient. So a discount that s.15 allowed had no clean statutory basis in s.34 — and s.15(3)(b) itself now points to s.34.

Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2026 inserts into s.34(1), after "both supplied are found to be deficient", the words "or where a discount referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 15 is given".

The circularity closes: s.15(3)(b) requires a s.34 credit note, and s.34(1) now expressly permits one for exactly that discount.

The recipient's reversal is still the hinge

What survives untouched is the condition that actually protects revenue: the recipient must reverse the ITC attributable to the discount.

That is a condition on someone else's conduct. The supplier gets the value reduction only if the customer does something in their own return. Practically:

  • the credit note must reach the recipient and be acted on;
  • the reversal shows up in the recipient's GSTR-3B Table 4(B);
  • through the Invoice Management System, a credit note the recipient rejects or ignores will not produce the reversal, and the supplier's reduction fails.

Distributors and FMCG suppliers running large rebate programmes should expect the operational burden to move from drafting agreements in advance to chasing reversals afterwards. That is a better problem, but it is not no problem. Invoice Management System and credit notes →

Section 34(2) time limit is unchanged

The amendment does not touch s.34(2), which still requires the credit note to be declared in the return for the month in which it is issued and no later than 30 November following the end of the financial year in which the supply was made, or the date of the annual return, whichever is earlier.

So a rebate for FY 2026-27 must be credit-noted and declared by 30 November 2027. The relaxation is about what you must prove, not how long you have.

What to do before the notification

Until the Government notifies sections 153 and 154, the old test applies in full. Practical steps:

  • Keep issuing framework rebate agreements at the start of the year, with the slab mechanics spelled out. Cheap insurance, and still required today.
  • Continue whatever invoice-linkage documentation you have — a reconciliation mapping the rebate to the underlying invoice set.
  • Keep written confirmation of the recipient's reversal. This condition survives the amendment, so nothing here is wasted effort.
  • Do not start issuing unsupported summary credit notes on the strength of an unnotified amendment.

Key takeaways

  • The substituted s.15(3)(b) needs only a credit note plus the recipient's ITC reversal.
  • The pre-agreement and specific invoice linkage conditions are removed.
  • s.34(1) is amended to make a s.15(3)(b) discount an express ground for a credit note.
  • Not yet in force — both start on a date to be notified.
  • The s.34(2) 30 November deadline is unchanged.
  • The recipient's reversal remains the operative condition, and IMS is where it now plays out.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on the Finance Act, 2026 and the ICAI Bare Law, 12th edition. Sections 153 and 154 are not yet notified; check cbic.gov.in for the commencement notification.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Post

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What is changing in section 15(3)(b)?

The requirement that a post-supply discount be established by an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices is being removed. A credit note plus the recipient's ITC reversal will be enough.

Is the new section 15(3)(b) in force?

No. Sections 153 and 154 of the Finance Act, 2026 come into force on a date to be notified by the Central Government. Until then the old two-condition test applies.

A clean record is built one small filing at a time, not in the week before an inspection.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Post: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
VS
About the author
9,274 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The requirement that a post-supply discount be established by an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices is being removed. A credit note plus the recipient's ITC reversal will be enough.

No. Sections 153 and 154 of the Finance Act, 2026 come into force on a date to be notified by the Central Government. Until then the old two-condition test applies.

Only if it satisfies the existing test — established by a pre-supply agreement and linked to relevant invoices, with the recipient reversing the attributable credit.

Yes. That condition is retained in the substituted clause and remains the operative safeguard.

Section 34(1) allowed credit notes only for excess value or tax, sales returns, or deficient supplies. A negotiated post-supply discount was none of these, so it had no express basis. Section 154 adds it.

Yes — section 34(2) is unchanged. Declare it by 30 November following the end of the financial year of the supply, or the date of the annual return, whichever is earlier.