Next dueGST
11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 15 days 13 NOVIFF (QRMP) · B2B invoices · Oct 2026in 17 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 24 days 25 NOVPMT-06 (QRMP) · Monthly GST payment · Oct 2026in 29 days 31 DECGSTR-9 / 9C · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 65 days 13 JANGSTR-1 (QRMP) · Quarterly return · Oct–Dec 2026in 78 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 3 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 11 days
All due dates
GST

GSTR-9C Tables 15 and 16: Unreconciled ITC and Tax Payable

Part IV ends where Part III did — with a payable. But this one is unusual: Table 16 computes interest and penalty on an input tax credit difference, not on tax short-paid on a...

Published
Updated
Reading time
6 min
Questions
6 answered
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
GST
Published
September 5, 2026
Last updated
Sep 5, 2026
Reading time
6 min
0:00
Last updated: September 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27Verified against: Government sources

Part IV ends where Part III did — with a payable. But this one is unusual: Table 16 computes interest and penalty on an input tax credit difference, not on tax short-paid on a supply.

Table 15: reading the difference

"This Table is auto populated as it is a calculation of difference between Table 14R and 14S. This is the differential amount between the eligible availed ITC and the availed ITC."

A positive difference — eligible credit per the expense analysis exceeds credit claimed in the return — arises from:

  • "Ineligible ITC availed by the registered person";
  • "ITC booked in the books of accounts but not availed including ineligible ITC not availed (lapsed)."

A negative difference "can arise on account of ITC booked in the books of accounts but availed in return FORM GSTR-3B of the subsequent year. This can be correlated with Table 13 of FORM GSTR-9."

And the table cannot be independently tested: "This column cannot be validated separately. The reason for such differences has to be explained."

Two differences, one destination

Part IV produces two unreconciled figures:

DifferenceFromReasons in
ITC 1 — Table 12FBooks (12D) against annual return (12E)Table 13
ITC 2 — Table 14TExpense-wise eligible credit (14R) against annual return (14S)Table 15

And Table 16 takes both. "This column captures tax which is to be paid on account of differences identified in Tables 13 and 15 above. Taxes paid in this Table should ideally be equal to the total of the differences of the two Tables (when positive)."

The parenthesis matters. Only positive differences — excess credit taken — become payable. A negative difference, being credit not yet claimed, is an entitlement rather than a liability, and there is no negative row here any more than in Table 11. Table 11 and the absence of negative reporting →

Interest and penalty on a credit difference

"It is important to note that the Table also demands computation of interest and penalty on such ITC differential."

This is the only place in the statement where that combination appears, and it follows from how excess credit is treated in the Act.

Interest. Where credit was wrongly availed and utilised, interest runs under section 50(3) read with rule 88B(3) — from the date of utilisation to the date of reversal or payment. Credit availed but never utilised does not attract interest under that provision.

Penalty. Excess or wrongly availed credit is within section 73 or section 74 depending on whether fraud or wilful misstatement is present, and the penalty differs accordingly — which is why the row exists rather than being assumed nil.

And the practical instruction from the GSTR-9 side applies here too. Where ineligible credit "has already been utilized, the same is to be paid in cash through Form GST DRC-03"; where it remains unutilised, it can simply be reversed. GSTR-9 Table 7 →

What the two reason tables should actually say

Table 13 — the reasons the Guide lists for the Table 12F difference:

Positive: credit "claimed in Table 13 of the annual return", being credit of the year taken in the next year's returns; and "ITC available but not availed", split between "Ineligible ITC not availed" and "ITC which has lapsed".

Negative: "ITC of another GSTIN claimed in returns of other GSTIN"; "IGST on imported goods used as FOC replacement warranty"; "Duplicate ITC availed"; and "ITC of subsequent year where goods/services were received later but their invoice was received prior."

Table 15 — the reasons for the Table 14T difference: ineligible credit availed, credit booked but not availed including lapsed ineligible credit, and, if negative, credit availed in the next year's GSTR-3B.

The two lists overlap deliberately. The same underlying event — say a duplicate claim — will usually appear in both differences, and the amount is paid once in Table 16, not twice.

And one structural difference now runs through 12F automatically: the exclusion of Table 6A1 credit from Table 7J, which the Guide directs be explained in Table 13 rather than paid. Table 12 and the 6A1 gap →

Where Table 16 goes

"Any additional tax liability arising due to non-reconciliation of the input tax credit are to be disclosed in Table 16… The amount reported in these two Tables [11 and 16] would be summarized and reported in Part V."

So Part IV's output and Part III's output meet in Part V, and both are "to be paid through Cash." Part V →

Key takeaways

  • Table 15 explains the 14R against 14S difference; Table 16 carries the resulting tax payable.
  • A positive difference means ineligible credit availed, or credit booked but not availed and now lapsed.
  • A negative difference generally means credit booked this year and claimed next year — correlate with Table 13 of GSTR-9.
  • Table 15 cannot be validated independently — the reasons must be explained.
  • Table 16 takes both ITC 1 (Table 12F) and ITC 2 (Table 14T) and "should ideally be equal to the total of the differences of the two Tables (when positive)".
  • Only positive differences are payable; there is no negative row.
  • Table 16 uniquely requires interest and penalty on a credit difference — interest under section 50(3) where credit was utilised, penalty under section 73 or 74.
  • Utilised ineligible credit must be paid in cash through DRC-03; unutilised credit can be reversed.
  • The same event may appear in both differences but is paid once.
  • Table 16 and Table 11 are summarised in Part V, both payable through the cash ledger.

Read next

Disclaimer: Positions stated as on 5 September 2026, based on Form GSTR-9C and its instructions, sections 50, 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, rule 88B of the CGST Rules, 2017 and Form GST DRC-03, as reproduced in the ICAI Technical Guide on GST Reconciliation Statement (Form GSTR-9C).

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About GSTR

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What does Table 15 report?

The reasons for the difference between eligible credit per the expense-head analysis in Table 14R and the credit declared in the annual return at Table 14S.

What does a negative difference in Table 15 mean?

That credit was booked in the books this year but availed in the next year's GSTR-3B — correlated with Table 13 of GSTR-9.

Classification decides the rate, and the rate decides everything after it — settle it first.

— TaxClue GST Desk

GSTR: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vikas Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

The reasons for the difference between eligible credit per the expense-head analysis in Table 14R and the credit declared in the annual return at Table 14S.

That credit was booked in the books this year but availed in the next year's GSTR-3B — correlated with Table 13 of GSTR-9.

Both ITC 1 from Table 12F and ITC 2 from Table 14T, through the reasons stated in Tables 13 and 15.

No. Only positive differences — excess credit availed — become payable.

Because wrongly availed and utilised credit attracts interest under section 50(3) and penalty under section 73 or 74, unlike credit merely availed and never used.

It is summarised, with Table 11, into Part V — additional liability due to non-reconciliation, payable through the electronic cash ledger.