Next due
30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 3 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 11 days 11 NOVGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Oct 2026in 15 days 15 NOVPF & ESI · Contributions · Oct 2026in 19 days 20 NOVGSTR-3B · Summary return · Oct 2026in 24 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 25 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 33 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 49 days
All due dates

Competition Act 2002 and CCI: Anti-Competitive Agreements, Dominance Abuse and Merger Control

Guide to Competition Act 2002 and CCI. Covers anti-competitive agreements (Section 3), abuse of dominant position (Section 4), CCI merger approval for combinations, and penalties.

Published
Updated
Reading time
3 min
Questions
6 answered
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Consumer Protection
Published
May 13, 2026
Last updated
May 13, 2026
Reading time
3 min
0:00
Last updated: May 2026Verified against: Government sources

The Competition Act 2002 is India's primary antitrust law, prohibiting practices that harm competition and consumer welfare. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) enforces the Act. Key provisions cover anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and mandatory merger approval (combinations).

Section 3 — Anti-Competitive Agreements

Agreements between enterprises that cause or likely to cause Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition (AAEC) are void and prohibited. Two categories:

Horizontal Agreements (Between Competitors)

Price fixing, bid rigging, market allocation, and output restriction are treated as per se illegal (no need to prove AAEC — presumed).

Vertical Agreements (Between Supply Chain Parties)

Resale Price Maintenance (RPM), exclusive supply/distribution, refusal to deal — Rule of Reason applies (must prove AAEC considering efficiency gains).

Section 4 — Abuse of Dominant Position

A dominant enterprise (significant market power in relevant market) abuses its position by:

  • Imposing unfair or discriminatory prices/conditions
  • Predatory pricing (below cost to eliminate competition)
  • Limiting production, market, or technical development
  • Denying market access (refusal to deal, exclusivity)
  • Leveraging dominance in one market into another

Combinations — Merger Control (Section 6)

Mergers, acquisitions, and amalgamations above threshold must be pre-notified to CCI:

ThresholdIndia TestGlobal Test
AssetsCombined India assets > Rs. 2,000 croreCombined global assets > USD 1 billion
TurnoverCombined India turnover > Rs. 6,000 croreCombined global turnover > USD 3 billion

CCI must clear combinations within 210 working days (typically 30 days for Phase I). For complex mergers, Phase II review (100 days) with remedies possible.

CCI Penalties

  • Section 3/4 violations: Up to 10% of average annual turnover for 3 preceding financial years
  • Cartels: Up to 3x profit for each cartel year or 10% of turnover (whichever is higher)
  • Non-notification of combination: Up to Rs. 1 crore per day of delay

Leniency Programme

CCI's Lesser Penalty Regulations allow cartel members who disclose and cooperate to receive 100% (first), 50% (second), or 25% (subsequent) reduction in penalty. Encourages cartel self-disclosure.

Need Expert Help?

TaxClue's CA and legal team can assist you. Contact us or see our services.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Competition Act 2002

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes Competition Act 2002 end to end for you.

What types of agreements are per se illegal under the Competition Act?

Horizontal agreements between competitors for price fixing, bid rigging, market sharing, and output restriction are presumed to cause AAEC and are per se illegal.

What is the CCI merger notification threshold?

Combined Indian assets > Rs. 2,000 crore or turnover > Rs. 6,000 crore. Or combined global assets > USD 1 billion or turnover > USD 3 billion.

A penalty is the visible cost of a delay; the lost time and credibility are the larger part.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Competition Act 2002: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
Vivek Sharma Tax & Compliance Expert at TaxClue
Updated:

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Horizontal agreements between competitors for price fixing, bid rigging, market sharing, and output restriction are presumed to cause AAEC and are per se illegal.

Combined Indian assets > Rs. 2,000 crore or turnover > Rs. 6,000 crore. Or combined global assets > USD 1 billion or turnover > USD 3 billion.

Up to 3 times the profit from the cartel for each year, or 10% of average annual turnover for 3 years — whichever is higher.

First cartel member to disclose to CCI gets 100% penalty reduction. Second gets 50%, subsequent members get 25% — incentivizing self-disclosure.

A position of strength in a relevant market that enables an enterprise to operate independently of competitive forces, or affects competitors/consumers in its favor.

Phase I clearance: 30 working days. Complex mergers (Phase II): up to 210 working days total.