What Is a Written Statement?
A written statement is the defendant's formal response to the plaintiff's plaint — setting out the defendant's defence, denials, admissions, and counter-allegations. Under Order 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): the defendant must file a written statement within 30 days of service of summons (extendable by the court up to a maximum of 120 days). The written statement is the defendant's primary tool for establishing their defence — it defines the issues for trial and determines what facts need to be proved. A failure to file a written statement within the prescribed time may result in the court proceeding ex parte (without the defendant's participation).
Timeline for Filing — Order 8 Rule 1
Rule 1: The defendant must file the written statement within 30 days from the date of service of summons. Proviso: The court may extend the time up to 90 days from the date of service for reasons to be recorded. Supreme Court Direction (Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India): The maximum time for filing written statement should NOT exceed 120 days from the date of service. Beyond 120 days: the defendant forfeits the right to file — the court may proceed to hear the matter on the basis of the plaint alone. However: courts have discretion to allow late filing in exceptional circumstances (to prevent injustice).
Structure of Written Statement
1. Court Heading
Same court as the plaint — "IN THE COURT OF [Court Name], [City]" with suit number.
2. Parties
[Plaintiff Name] ..... PLAINTIFF | VERSUS | [Defendant Name] ..... DEFENDANT
WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT
3. Preliminary Objections
Before addressing the merits: raise any preliminary objections that may dispose of the suit without trial: (a) Jurisdiction: "This court has no jurisdiction — the cause of action arose at [Place] which is outside this court's territorial limits." (b) Limitation: "The suit is barred by limitation — the cause of action arose on [Date] and the limitation period expired on [Date]." (c) Res Judicata: "The matter has already been decided in Suit No. [Number] between the same parties — the present suit is barred by res judicata." (d) Non-joinder/Misjoinder: "The plaintiff has failed to join [Name] who is a necessary party." (e) Maintainability: "The suit is not maintainable because [reason — no cause of action, wrong forum]."
4. Para-wise Reply
The core of the written statement: respond to EACH paragraph of the plaint. For each paragraph: (a) Admit: "The contents of paragraph [X] are admitted." — Facts that the defendant accepts as true. Admitted facts need not be proved at trial. (b) Deny: "The contents of paragraph [X] are denied. The correct facts are [state correct facts]." — Facts that the defendant disputes. The defendant MUST specifically deny each allegation — a general denial is insufficient (Order 8 Rule 3: "evasive denial" is treated as admission). (c) Not admitted: "The contents of paragraph [X] are not admitted for want of knowledge." — Facts that the defendant neither confirms nor denies. The plaintiff must prove these facts.
Rule 3 — Specific Denial Required: The denial must be specific — not evasive. "The defendant denies paragraph 5" is INSUFFICIENT. Proper denial: "The defendant denies the allegation in paragraph 5 that the defendant borrowed Rs. 10 lakh from the plaintiff on March 1, 2023. The true facts are that the defendant received Rs. 10 lakh as an investment in a joint venture, not as a loan."
Rule 5 — Specific Denial of Documents: If the plaint refers to documents: the defendant must specifically deny the genuineness or validity of each document relied upon. A general denial is insufficient — each document must be addressed specifically.
5. Additional Defence (Affirmative Defence)
Facts and grounds of defence that go BEYOND mere denial: (a) Set-Off: "The defendant has a counter-claim against the plaintiff of Rs. [Amount] — the plaintiff owes this amount under [describe the claim]. The defendant claims set-off under Order 8 Rule 6." (b) Counter-Claim: "The defendant counter-claims against the plaintiff for Rs. [Amount] for [describe the cause of action]." — This is essentially a separate suit within the same proceedings (Order 8 Rule 6A-6G). (c) Estoppel: "The plaintiff is estopped from claiming [X] because [explain the estoppel]." (d) Waiver: "The plaintiff waived the right to [X] by their conduct — [explain]." (e) Fraud/Misrepresentation: "The agreement is voidable at the defendant's option because it was obtained by fraud — [explain the fraud]." (f) Part payment / Part performance: "The defendant has already paid Rs. [Amount] toward the claimed amount — [evidence]."
6. Prayer / Defence Prayer
"In view of the above, the defendant prays that this court may be pleased to: (a) dismiss the suit of the plaintiff with costs, (b) [if counter-claim: decree the counter-claim for Rs. [Amount]], (c) pass any other order as this court may deem fit."
7. Verification
Same format as plaint verification: "I, [Defendant Name], verify that the contents of paragraphs [X] are true to my personal knowledge and paragraphs [Y] are true to the best of my information and belief."
Set-Off vs Counter-Claim
| Feature | Set-Off (Rule 6) | Counter-Claim (Rule 6A) |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Defensive — reduces plaintiff's claim | Offensive — independent claim against plaintiff |
| Amount | Must not exceed plaintiff's claim | Can exceed plaintiff's claim |
| Subject | Must be for an ascertained sum | Can be for any relief (damages, declaration) |
| Cause of Action | May arise from same or different transaction | May arise from any transaction |
| Court fee | No additional court fee | Court fee payable on counter-claim value |
| Effect | Reduces the decree amount | Can result in a decree in defendant's favor |
Common Drafting Mistakes
(a) General denial: "All allegations are denied" — this is treated as admission (Rule 3). Each paragraph must be specifically addressed. (b) No alternative defence: Only denying facts without presenting the defendant's version. The written statement should tell the defendant's story. (c) Missing preliminary objections: Not raising jurisdiction, limitation, or res judicata at the earliest opportunity — these can be raised later but are more effective when raised in the written statement. (d) Late filing: Beyond 120 days — the court may refuse to accept the written statement. (e) No counter-claim: If the defendant has a claim against the plaintiff — raise it as a counter-claim in the written statement. Filing a separate suit is more expensive and time-consuming. (f) Inconsistent defence: Giving contradictory defences without clarifying they are alternative — "The defendant did not borrow the money" AND "The defendant has already repaid" are inconsistent unless framed as alternatives ("In the alternative, even if there was a borrowing, it has been repaid").
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy based on the latest laws and amendments, readers should consult a qualified professional before acting on any information provided. For expert assistance, contact us.