Section 142 — Remuneration of Auditors

What is Section 142 auditor remuneration Under the Companies Act 2013?

Section 142 auditor remuneration under Section 142 of the Companies Act, 2013 is the remuneration provision — auditor's remuneration is fixed by the members at the general meeting (or by the Board for first auditor). 'Remuneration' includes any sum paid to the auditor for professional services rendered by the auditor, whether as individual or as part of the firm.

In practice, the Board/audit committee recommends the remuneration and members approve it at AGM. The resolution typically says 'at a remuneration as may be fixed by the Board' — effectively delegating the decision. Remuneration includes: audit fee, certification fee, out-of-pocket expenses, and any other payments for professional services.

This guide covers Section 142 auditor remuneration comprehensively — legal requirements, applicability, procedures, examples, MCA forms, penalties, amendment history, 1956 vs 2013 comparison, judicial interpretations, and compliance checklists. Updated with all MCA notifications up to March 2026.

Who Must Comply with Section 142 auditor remuneration?

Section 142 auditor remuneration — Detailed Legal Analysis

Section 142 — Core Requirements

Substantive obligation: Section 142 establishes the legal framework for Section 142 auditor remuneration — covering what must be done, how to do it, what records to maintain, and consequences of non-compliance. Must be read with Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 for detailed procedures, forms, and timelines.

Key compliance steps: (a) Board resolution with proper minutes, attendance, and voting records, (b) Shareholder approval through ordinary or special resolution where required — 21 clear days notice for general meeting, (c) Professional certification by CS/CA/CMA where prescribed, (d) MCA form filing on V3 portal within statutory deadline (typically 15-30 days) with DSC, (e) Statutory register update within 7-15 days, (f) Stakeholder notification as prescribed by the section.

Private company exemptions: G.S.R. 464(E) dated 05.06.2015 (as amended) provides significant relaxations. Small companies (Section 2(85)) get further concessions. OPCs have simplified procedures. But a subsidiary of a public company gets NO exemptions — it is treated as a public company under Section 2(71).

Listed company additions: SEBI LODR regulations impose overlapping and often stricter requirements. Where the Companies Act and SEBI requirements differ, the stricter standard applies. Stock exchange intimation is typically required within 24 hours of Board decisions. Quarterly compliance reports must be filed with stock exchanges.

Rules and Regulatory Framework

The Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 prescribe detailed procedures, forms, timelines, and documentation. Non-compliance with rules attracts same penalties. All forms filed on MCA V3 portal (mca.gov.in) with DSC. Professional certification (CS/CA/CMA) required where specified. Late filing: additional fees 2x to 12x. G.S.R. 464(E) exemptions for private companies. Over 100 MCA circulars since 2014 provide guidance.

Practical Examples — Section 142 auditor remuneration

Example 1 — Small Company Compliance

Scenario: ABC Pvt Ltd (Small Company — capital Rs. 1 Cr, turnover Rs. 20 Cr, Faridabad) complying with Section 142.

Process: Board meeting with 2 directors (quorum) → Pass resolution with proper minutes → Prepare documents and certifications → File MCA form on V3 portal within deadline → Update statutory registers → Reflect in next MGT-7A. As Small Company: 2 Board meetings/year, simplified annual return, no cash flow statement, no auditor rotation.

Example 2 — Listed Company Enhanced Compliance

Scenario: MegaCorp Ltd (BSE/NSE listed, Rs. 500 Cr turnover) — full Section 142 compliance PLUS SEBI LODR. Must have functioning audit committee (Section 177), NRC (Section 178), stakeholders committee, vigil mechanism. Quarterly compliance reports to stock exchanges. Continuous disclosure obligations. Insider trading restrictions during compliance events.

Example 3 — Non-Compliance Consequences

Scenario: XYZ Ltd fails to comply with Section 142 for 2 consecutive years.

Consequences: ROC issues show cause under Section 454 → Company/officers reply within 30 days → Adjudication: penalty Rs. 1L-25L on company + Rs. 50,000-5L per officer → If annual filings also missed 3 years → director disqualification 5 years under Section 164(2) across ALL companies → ROC may initiate strike-off under Section 248.

MCA Forms Required

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Compliance Calendar

Event-based: Board resolution → Shareholder approval (if needed) → MCA form (15-30 days) → Register update (7-15 days) → Stakeholder notice.

Annual: AOC-4 (30 days AGM) → MGT-7 (60 days AGM) → ADT-1 (15 days AGM) → DIR-3 KYC (Sep 30) → DPT-3 (Jun 30). Board meetings: min 4/year (120-day max gap). AGM: within 6 months of FY end.

Judicial Interpretations

Supreme Court: Section 142 compliance is mandatory, not directory. Penalties upheld as reasonable. Directors deemed aware of all Board matters.

NCLT: Strict deadlines — one-day delays penalized. No inherent right to condonation. Constructive notice applies to ROC filings.

Compliance Checklist