What Is the Law of Limitation?
The Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes the time limit (prescribed period) within which a suit, appeal, or application must be filed before a court or tribunal. If the prescribed period expires without filing: the remedy is time-barred and the court MUST dismiss the suit/appeal (Section 3: "Every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence"). The law of limitation is based on the maxim "vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt" — the law assists those who are vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.
The Limitation Act is a procedural law — it does not extinguish the substantive right but bars the remedy. This means: even after the limitation period expires, the underlying right may exist — but the party cannot enforce it through courts. For example: if a creditor does not file a recovery suit within 3 years — the debt still exists, but the creditor cannot use courts to recover it (the debtor can voluntarily pay).
Key Limitation Periods — Civil Suits
| Type of Suit | Limitation Period | Article |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery of money lent (promissory note, loan) | 3 years from due date | Art. 19-22 |
| Suit on a contract (breach of contract) | 3 years from breach date | Art. 55 |
| Suit for recovery of movable property | 3 years from date of dispossession | Art. 27 |
| Suit for recovery of immovable property | 12 years from date of dispossession | Art. 64-65 |
| Suit for specific performance of contract | 3 years from date fixed for performance | Art. 54 |
| Suit for compensation (tort/negligence) | 1 year from date of wrong | Art. 72-73 |
| Suit for accounts (partnership) | 3 years from closure of accounts | Art. 34 |
| Suit for dissolution of partnership | 3 years from date of exclusion/expulsion | Art. 4 |
| Suit by mortgagor for redemption | 30 years from when mortgage money due | Art. 61 |
| Suit by mortgagee for foreclosure/sale | 30 years from mortgage money becoming due | Art. 63 |
Key Limitation Periods — Appeals
| Type of Appeal | Limitation Period | Article |
|---|---|---|
| First appeal to District Court (from decree) | 30 days | Art. 116 |
| First appeal to High Court (from decree) | 90 days | Art. 116 |
| Second appeal to High Court | 90 days | Art. 116 |
| Appeal from order under CPC | 30 days | Art. 116 |
| Review petition | 30 days | Art. 124 |
| Revision petition under Section 115 | 90 days (judicial practice) | No specific article |
| SLP to Supreme Court (civil) | 90 days | Art. 136 Constitution |
| SLP to Supreme Court (criminal) | 60 days | Art. 136 Constitution |
| Appeal to NCLAT (Companies Act) | 45 days | Section 421 |
| Appeal to NCLAT (IBC) | 30 days (+15 days extension) | Section 61 IBC |
Key Limitation Periods — Special Statutes
| Matter | Limitation Period | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax appeal to CIT(A) | 30 days from order | Section 246A IT Act |
| Income tax appeal to ITAT | 60 days from order | Section 253 IT Act |
| GST appeal to Appellate Authority | 3 months (+1 month extension) | Section 107 CGST |
| Consumer complaint (District) | 2 years from cause of action | Section 69 CPA 2019 |
| RERA complaint | 1 year from possession/defect | RERA Section 31 |
| Section 138 NI Act (cheque bounce) | 30 days from cause of action | Section 142 NI Act |
| Writ petition (Article 226) | No specific limitation (but must be prompt) | Judicial practice |
When Does Limitation Start? — Section 6-24
The limitation period begins from the date when the right to sue first accrues — not from the date the party becomes aware of the right. For different types of suits:
(a) Contract breach: From the date of breach (not from the date of contract).
(b) Recovery of money: From the date when the money becomes due and payable.
(c) Property dispossession: From the date of dispossession or when the right to possess arises.
(d) Tort/negligence: From the date when the tortious act was committed or the damage first occurred.
(e) Continuous wrongs: Fresh limitation arises each day the wrong continues — the suit can be filed within the prescribed period from the date of the last wrong.
Condonation of Delay — Section 5
Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows the court to condone (excuse) delay in filing an appeal or application (NOT a suit) if the appellant/applicant satisfies the court that they had "sufficient cause" for not filing within the prescribed period. Key principles:
(a) Section 5 applies ONLY to appeals and applications — NOT to suits. If a suit is time-barred: it is dismissed and Section 5 cannot save it.
(b) "Sufficient cause" is a liberal concept — courts adopt a liberal approach and consider: illness, absence from India, legal disability, bona fide mistake, wrong legal advice, and similar genuine reasons.
(c) Section 5 does NOT apply where a special statute provides a strict limitation with no extension — e.g., IBC Section 61 (30+15 days maximum — no further condonation).
(d) The Supreme Court in Collector of Land Acquisition v. Katiji (1987) laid down the principle: "Sufficient cause is to be interpreted liberally — delays should not preclude a party from having their case decided on merits."
Exclusion of Time — Sections 12-15
Section 12 — Time for obtaining certified copy: The time taken to obtain a certified copy of the decree/order (which is needed for filing the appeal) is EXCLUDED from the limitation period. This is the most commonly used exclusion provision.
Section 13 — Time during which court is closed: If the last day of limitation falls on a day when the court is closed (holiday): the filing can be done on the next day the court opens.
Section 14 — Time in bonafide proceedings in wrong court: If a party bona fide filed in the wrong court (lacking jurisdiction) and later files in the correct court: the time spent in the wrong court is excluded.
Section 15 — Legal disability: If the plaintiff is a minor, insane, or an idiot at the time the cause of action arises: the limitation period starts from the date the disability ceases (age of majority, recovery of sanity).
Acknowledgment and Part Payment — Sections 18-19
Section 18 — Acknowledgment: If a person liable for a debt or claim acknowledges the liability in writing (signed by them) before the limitation period expires: a fresh limitation period starts from the date of acknowledgment. This extends the time for filing. The acknowledgment must be: (a) in writing, (b) signed by the debtor, (c) made before the expiry of the original limitation period.
Section 19 — Part payment: If a debtor makes a part payment of the debt before the limitation expires: a fresh limitation period starts from the date of payment. This has significant practical implications — every part payment resets the clock.
Practical Tips
(a) Track limitation dates: Maintain a compliance calendar for all pending suits, appeals, and regulatory matters — missed deadlines are fatal. (b) Apply for certified copies immediately: After a decree/order: apply for the certified copy the SAME DAY — the time for obtaining the copy is excluded from limitation (Section 12). (c) File within time — always: Even if delay can be condoned: file within time to avoid the uncertainty and cost of condonation applications. (d) Get written acknowledgments: For debts and contractual obligations: get periodic written acknowledgments from the debtor to extend limitation (Section 18). (e) Special statute limitations: Many special statutes (IBC, GST, Income Tax) have their OWN limitation provisions that override the general Limitation Act — always check the specific statute first.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy based on the latest laws and amendments, readers should consult a qualified professional before acting on any information provided. For expert assistance, contact us.