Skip to main content
Monday, 5 October 2026
TaxClue News
Morning brief

CCI directs Trustees’ Association of India and three debenture trustees to cease and desist from fixing a benchmark fee; no monetary penalty

By an order dated 2 September 2026 under section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002, CCI has directed Trustees’ Association of India, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, Axis Trustee Services Limited and SBI CAP Trustee Company Limited to cease and desist from conduct found to violate section 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) read with section 3(1). No monetary penalty was imposed.

Key facts

Published
3 September 2026
In force
CCI order dated 2 September 2026
Who it affects
Debenture trustees, issuers of debentures, trade associations and their office-bearers, company secretaries and compliance officers
Editor3 September 2026 · 3 min read

In 30 seconds

  • The order is dated 2 September 2026 and was passed in Case No. 29 of 2021.
  • It is addressed to Trustees’ Association of India (TAI), IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, Axis Trustee Services Limited and SBI CAP Trustee Company Limited, and their respective individuals liable under section 48.
  • CCI found that the opposite parties fixed the benchmark price for debenture trusteeship services during FY 2020-21 and 2021-22.
  • The finding is based on the minutes of a meeting of TAI and certain email exchanges.
  • The conduct was found to be in violation of section 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) read with section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.
  • In consideration of the mitigating factors, no monetary penalty was imposed on the opposite parties or their individuals.

The order

According to a release of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) dated 3 September 2026, the Commission, by an order dated 2 September 2026 under section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002, has directed the following to cease and desist from anti-competitive conduct:

  • Trustees’ Association of India (TAI);
  • IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited;
  • Axis Trustee Services Limited;
  • SBI CAP Trustee Company Limited; and
  • their respective individuals liable under section 48 of the Act.

The conduct was found to be in violation of section 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) read with section 3(1) of the Act. The order was passed in Case No. 29 of 2021.

What CCI found

PointAs stated in the release
ConductThe opposite parties fixed the benchmark price for providing debenture trusteeship services
PeriodFY 2020-21 and 2021-22
Evidence relied onMinutes of meeting of Trustees’ Association of India and certain email exchanges
Finding on priceThe collective fixing of a minimum price/fee by TAI and other follow-on actions prevented independent commercial decision-making by the debenture trustees and amounted to cartelisation in terms of the Act
Finding on supplyThe conduct also amounts to limiting and controlling the supply/market for these services, as members of TAI as well as non-members were dictated not to provide services to issuers of debentures below the benchmark fee
IndividualsCertain officials of TAI and of the three companies were found liable under section 48
PenaltyIn consideration of the mitigating factors, no monetary penalty was imposed on the opposite parties and their individuals

The release does not name the individuals and does not list the mitigating factors.

Where to read the order

The release says a copy of the order is available on the CCI website, www.cci.gov.in.

What trade associations and their members should take from it

The order, as reported in the release, treats a benchmark or minimum fee set through an association as price-fixing under section 3(3)(a), and a direction not to serve customers below that fee as limiting or controlling supply under section 3(3)(b). The release also records that officials were held liable under section 48, although no penalty was levied in this case. Issuers of debentures, debenture trustees and association office-bearers who want the reasoning should read the order on the CCI website.

Questions and answers

What did CCI order in the Trustees’ Association of India case?

By an order dated 2 September 2026 under section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002, CCI directed Trustees’ Association of India, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, Axis Trustee Services Limited and SBI CAP Trustee Company Limited, and their individuals liable under section 48, to cease and desist from the conduct found to be anti-competitive.

What was the conduct?

As per the release, CCI found that the opposite parties fixed the benchmark price for providing debenture trusteeship services during FY 2020-21 and 2021-22, and that members as well as non-members of the association were dictated not to provide services below the benchmark fee.

Was a penalty imposed?

No. The release says that, in consideration of the mitigating factors, no monetary penalty was imposed on the opposite parties and their individuals.

Which case is this?

Case No. 29 of 2021. A copy of the order is available on the CCI website, www.cci.gov.in.

TopicsCCICompetition Act 2002section 3(3)section 27section 48debenture trusteesTrustees’ Association of Indiacartelisationcease and desist

Share this story

Send it to a client, a colleague or your group.

Editor

TaxClue News reports changes in tax, GST, trade and company law from the source document, and links that document in every story.

Published 3 September 2026. Updated 5 October 2026. This report is for general information and is not professional advice. Read the source document before acting on it.

Share

The morning brief

One email each working morning with the day’s tax, GST and company-law news. It is starting soon; leave your address and it comes to you from day one.